How Do I Get My Dogs Hair To Grow Back

Wikipedia: fuck Admins late Tron further

In terms of the massive destruction of evidence on the Wikipedia tries to Wikimedia Germany eV with their agents, double agents and Wikipolizisten to disappear as quickly as possible additional evidence. But even here, the friends of the mole were faster because they have archived all. For example, within the Association discussed "Legal defense tactics for action", which is found currently only here.

Admin of Wikipedia called Alexander Klimke aka " Berlin-Jurist ," Ex-prosecutor Berlin, former State Office for State Protection and ex-employees of the Federal Interior Ministry, why probably only have this agent as many ex-designations carry with them? A super agent who has destroyed then why the history of Tron for free non-knowledge of an encyclopedia in order to impede the normal Recherieren for talented people to the courts or to make it impossible? A top agent with significant capabilities and a corresponding influence? Really? Safe? Then would the friends of the mole all geniuses and masterminds because it was created before the crack still back it.

trial tactics of the Wikimedia Germany eV for action
Defense - A legal advice from Alexander Klimke -

The Best tactic, if someone from the Wiki section, regardless of whether or Privatman institution is sued, in my view, to deny that sued to Spich be incorrect action opponents. In this regard, useful information for me I could not live out in the report, although I this area with the most important think.

extreme example, not recommended for imitation, just to clarify:

exclusively in a "Berlin-Jurist" written article is a clear copyright violation detected. On the user side of the applicants come to the real name Alexander Klimke and complains against me. Now I say very boldly in the process of having nothing to do with Wikipedia. Now, the plaintiff must prove that in fact I've become active in my name in the Wiki and have written the article. He could try to get some information about the application log files to the IP in question to determine which would be questionable again, against whom and where would complain. Now the applicant would have to take action against the provider to determine the then users of the static IP. By this time data will be deleted long ago. The applicant can prove my not be sued and lose the trial, no matter how clearly the copyright infringement was. If

about the association be sued, could be argued that the club does not exercise control over the server, nor is the responsibility of, etc. The plate hint in ruling that, in principle, any is liable, which has something to do with it, in my opinion reaches for any event, further ausurteilen as German courts would. All flavors of wiki in Germany would in any case do I think well to the actual organization officially to do Wiki-operation as few have. Then, because there are no suitable action opponents in Germany for potential applicants.

guarantees, would decide how German courts can give unfortunately no one.

This text is for a mailing list for my opinion really too long, I would like to ask him out make modifications reasons reluctant in the wiki. can
About This advice can only shake his head:

Alexander Klimke
FvMM is correct. The Wikimedia Germany eV with Wikipedia administrators very good access, Management rights, enforcement rights, extinguishing rights and other rights specifically for the creation, management and maintenance of content on the German Wikipedia as defined as a self-service services. For what else is there for Wikimedia Germany eV people who are members of the board, while also Wikipedia administrators? Therefore this association can be sued right now all the first - especially if he refuses to remedy a violation of the law on the German Wikipedia. More on this topic, see also the interview .

Wish You Well Book Chapter Summary

Wikimedia:: Process tactic to complain Defense

dignity of the family name of Tron "Miller" or "Meier" hot, the whole case would be interpreted differently. But the family of Tron exists in Germany only once and always leads back to the parents and family members of Tron. This situation with this feature is ignored by the Wikimedia Germany eV and the admins of Wikipedia ruthless.

Everyone is constitutional because the Constitution out the right to anonymity and privacy. This was also one of the reasons why Tron has abandoned his family name on the Internet before. The talented technicians was precisely because of the special and single family name very easily identifiable. In his circle of friends you were not at all interested in his family name, but in what contributed Tron with his amazing works. Tron was simply just simply the sympathetic Tron .

group orgy on the Wikipedia

is now after his death, rape the corpse with privacy and data protection law violations on Wikipedia, so that the relevant known Wikipedia listener's play of murder and stop threats against parents who are family members or can make the travel agency. And fuck in this bustle of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia Admins Germany eV then also equal to the throne, by casting them out all the people who insist on abbreviation "Tron" or "Boris F.", easy.

But if these perverse people from the administrator's group orgy forced to miss a legal notice to catch the cowards in Germany to cry. Since the German cowards suddenly want to get out, like a told the ex-Wikipolizist FvMM Group . And while they refuse to remove Tron family. This could which fit like that. Dirk Bauer aka Dick abdominal , Nina aka Nina Gerlach Transceiver laughing the Max-Planck-Institut Göttingen , Philipp Birken aka DaTroll from the University of Kassel , Mark aka Markus welding welding the conductor of the Contra Rapid , Daniel Baur aka DAB. from the Technical University of Darmstadt , Anneke Wolf aka cellar child from the Institute of Ethnology Hamburg, Dirk Ingo Franke aka South Park of the Arte TV , Jan Henning aka descriptor, and how they all hot. There are more and more.

How did Tron, we you!

All these service providers have with their access rights, management rights, Rights enforcement, fire and all other rights in particular for the creation, management and maintenance of content on the Wikipedia in the sense as a self-service services, the ability to remove Tron's family name. They refuse all itself. Admin arbitrariness and abuse of the admin buttons best. The longer Tron's surname at the Wikipedia's in it, the more flies open. The 29köpfige FvMM Group adds: "As you Tron, we you!" Is

A few minutes Tronline went online. This means that all responsible administrators of the series will be advised by and displayed. Including the employer, and then they lose womöglicherweise because only seven letters in Tron article also their workplace. It could not be stupider probably more. Hach! It's cool for FvMM group to be assholes.

Install Netflix On A Uk Xbox

Wikipedia you kip like politicians

you are like many politicians in Germany. First of all great cinema, with its election promises. If they were then elected, they shall again be lazy. A 16 year old student makes it in front of the Wikimedia Germany eV, as one should do not. But this time the Wikimedia interested again. But perhaps it smells Wikimedians strategy.

The district southeast of Berlin Treptow is a special district to work, live and relax. There is also a school, for example, the 16 year old Cornelius Kibelka visited. In his spare time he works on Berlin's underground trains and metro networks in the world. The gifted student is familiar with the many technical details of the subways. Information on manufacturers, types of construction and the special features are its strengths. To this end he has hundreds of photos from various metros. In Germany Radio has one of the specialists are an interview conducted with his answers and he has sent advertised Wikipedia , as he puts his knowledge to regularly on the Wikipedia and makes his photos for free.

This district Treptow, where the 16 year old student lives, is a district with history, tradition, and many stories. Not only from this underground freak, but as the story about the "Captain of Köpenick . Every Wednesday and Saturday at 11.00 clock is this legend to interested citizens from the historical Rathaus Köpenick out before our eyes. They repeated the event in 1906, when the unemployed shoemaker Wilhelm Voigt spent as a captain and put many people inside. Köpenickiade, a form of imposture, surreptitiously in the office of arrogance and obedience is to get at money. This Köpenickiade and the Wikimedia Germany eV could have something in common. For example, if the 1 Chairman Kurt Jansson before all public claimed he was "Since 2003, the press spokesman of the German Wikipedia" - although that is not true. And already running after him and fills Fritzchen Goofy the club treasury of the Wikimedia German - and not of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. American

Even the students from the borough of "Captain of Köpenick " Köpenickiade is the best known. Really funny is it when the meet-Köpenickiade Wikimedia and Köpenickiade expert Cornelius Kibelka. For example the Wikimedia Germany eV in their blog as so on 1 March 2006 happen. A week ago, the board elections were held. To date the changes were not published on the Meta-Wikimedia for the purpose of free knowledge. "Huhu you can, please be her ' Wikimedia_Deutschland / Board ' Update ", the student brought it there in Wikimedia blog to the point. And with a "It interested some non-members, for example, who is now treasurer of" there he could no longer justify appropriate. A 16 year old students, it shows the old hands of the Wikimedia what has been understood by a Purpose in a society of "free knowledge" actually.

Kibelka And Cornelius is also right when the changes are not even makes the meta.wikimedia. He might in fact be made in cases of false or incorrect information may be liable. Also understands the students. Therefore, he speaks directly to them rather on it to bring the Wikimedia Germany eV forward. All of this is - of all things according to their campaign promises - not only embarrassing or shameful, but these are kip wimps who for nearly a week and have been set after the election to be lazy. As for the politicians. Must always connect to the people in the butt. And now understood by the readers of this blog Insiders also why "brings Cornelius (16), the Wikipedia in ride" this saying Sun terrible to love:

Fun Wording For Western

Wikipedia criticism with threats of data protection law

The Wikimedia Germany eV and the German Wikipedia refuse to appoint their representatives and the competent data protection supervisory authority. And even though she already has a very clear knowledge of data protection sought. They acknowledged receipt and that's never been. So not.

The publication of the reply has so far refused and "illegal" forced renaming process goes to first place does not address the data protection aspects. No matter Wikimedia Germany eV or whether the German language Wikipedia with all the service provider and their residence in Germany, German laws are apparently completely damn them and they can in fact be important:

Opinion Iaal

" Hi Henry & Co., I agree to a forced name change, since it would hinder my voluntary work items to free knowledge from the Wikipedia anti-competitive and at the same time the name is protected. Will be forced to rename or held a different kind of sanction, for the Wikimedia Foundation, Jimmy Wales does not contractually determined Agreement in favor of Wikimedia Germany eV and for the benefit of de.wikipedia.org has issued, then the relevant Data Protection Officer of Wikimedia Germany eV with the associated supervisory authority IAAL record for my German de.wikipedia.org to be solved between, § 20, paragraph 2 of the Federal Privacy Act.

I'm after the deletion of the record IAAL agree that another IAAL IAAL a new record for IAAL account can set up German de.wikipedia.org. IAAL is only a concept, stands for "I am a lawyer " ("I am a lawyer") and, according to the Federal Bar Association there alone is only in Germany for about 100,000 other lawyers. Having regard to the filing system to meet within their respective tasks is no longer necessary.

What this means exactly, I try to explain to the layman like this: Both the user blocking and the forced name change is not permitted for many legal reasons for privacy in particular, since only the collection of my own already IAAL record by de.wikipedia.org and because of the lack of the Wikimedia specifications for Teleservices Data Protection Act inadmissible from the outset and was therefore unlawful. Thus, only the deletion of the IAAL record is allowed. Should be the change, I refer here to the penalty and fines to the Federal Privacy Act, and teleservices data protection law "

source. http://fvmm.blogspot.com/2006/02/
wikiprawda-du- will-zwangsumbenannt.html # c114051926817956395

, responsible data protection officer is not mentioned. The reply of the Wikimedia Germany eV is not published at the same place on the Wikipedia and the causing Admin Mark Welding has - how typical it is for him - not want to. And, the records and the contents of Iaal not been deleted even though the board member Henriette Fiebig took both requests and receive and receive even more explicitly has confirmed.

were removed for the records of censoring Admin Stephan Tesch , the censored not only to third parties, but even himself One has to "Steschke" according to the blog entry " criticism is top secret "dated 30.01.2006 around 08:30 clock - In which the censoring Stephan Tesch is blown completely - then about 11 hours later at 19:32 on 30/01/2006 Teschke clock records disappear completely . This proves that the deletion is working very well and Iaal with its data protection statement (see above) was right. Deletion is possible. In the German Wikipedia is lied and cheated so crooked can not even turn the bars.

Who Sang Lets Jam Radio Active

Wikimedia: New fronts for Wikipedia

Again Wikimedia Germany eV and again their Wikipedia. Again criticism about Wikipedia, which has this club made their own. And again and again Admin arbitrary abuse of the admin buttons. Here, by Markus sweat, Henriette Fiebig and Stephan Tesch. Acting together, they have had a risk of blocking a user does not only come to an opinion.

This hypocrisy stitch German Wikipedia is about to take any more. In an email from the Admin Henriette Fiebig Iaal she admitted that Iaal could give an opinion, because the lock was not repealed. Quote from the transfer of Iaal:

"IAAL Hi, I have forgotten smooth, free up your user account again. That's was not evil intent, but simply Verpeilung. Please excuse me for that! Henriette Fiebig "

This was again confirmed in the comments :

" I (the quote you may venture), Depp had forgotten fact in the whole mess to unlock his account again ! That's really been an oversight and not an evil intent. I have but just made up now. Greeting Henriette

Later
has also been found that Admin Stephan Tesch also installed an additional lock added. Of course, even here without a prior consultation procedure, and without compliance to the Wikipedia rules. Iaal has informed us that he could not login. He got from the Wikipedia system following message:

"User is blocked. If you believe that the prohibition was without justification, turn up, indicating the IP address or user name, blocking background and a description of your process via e-mail to info@wikipedia.de To the workload to a minimum, Please only apply up with longer locks to this address. "

wikipedia.de The domain name is Arne Klempert and Admin Henriette Fiebig Iaal ripped when she tells him that he would be unlocked and he could even make the statement in the Commons. Now it becomes clearer why has refused Admin Henriette Fiebig, leave the alternative, the opinion of Iaal in the Wikipedia. Iaal could and should give an opinion. why he allowed Fiebig, that it is delivering to him the opinion if he does not even come inside. Admin and Henriette Fiebig had no desire .

Is it any wonder, when get to the Wikipedia and Wikimedia to this "illegal" methods even more enemies and problems as they already can not cope now? But so are just the malicious computer specialists, these so-called crackers, the break in the Commons and how much wild pack animals bother about. We are looking forward to the reactions the new fronts, which were admin Markus welding and Admin Henriette Fiebig launched.

Update: Iaal announced that its text and data are still online , although the board member Admin Henriette Fiebig of Wikimedia Germany eV has received two opinions and the receipt of this has even confirmed yet. Of a "lock" can therefore not be discussed. What will the Wikimedia Germany eV dabbles with her German Wikipedia about even on the texts, data and records of other people? A legal claim may not have been the same, and the copyright does not have . That would mean they have the text donors once let in to the text donations and then the user without reason thrown to retain so its text, data and records more easily.

Does Professional Hairdy

reply against Wikipedia and Wikimedia

just 50 hours and 19 minutes at the Wikipedia online. And outside only because the user name again. That the user: the Wikipedia has never attacked IAAL has, has already proven his reply and his affidavit. We show here the reply to this case. Then, every blog reader an idea about these malicious Admin arbitrariness and the abuse of admin rights to make the Wikipedia.

criticism on the German Wikipedia in a very other way. Unpublished reply against Wikipedia and Wikimedia User: IAAL

" reply to" User: IAAL forever "in the User: Markus welding

Since 01.12.2006 member of the Wikipedia, that is, beginner, referring to the radical and free vote total ban by user: Markus welding http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spezial:Log&type = block & user = & page = User: IAAL

16:51, 15 January 2006 User: Markus welding blocked "IAAL - (Special: Contributions / User: IAAL Markus welding blocked # 25 045 (up to infinite) (Automatically blocks, because you have an IP address with User: IAAL use reason. " threatens legal action of Wikipedia, so intolerable for the project.)

http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spezial:Log&type=block&user=&page=Benutzer:IAAL http://de.wikipedia.org/w / index.php title = User: IAAL & action = edit http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Benutzer:IAAL&diff=12640875&oldid=12618825 http://de .wikipedia.org / wiki / Special: Contributions / IAAL




reply

a threat of "legal action to Wikipedia" has not taken place.
I am not a party to proceedings in the current dispute about Tron family

My independent communication of information and expression, a lawsuit by third parties any legal action is in itself against Wikipedia dar.

A lock agreement with the result, "IAAL to be blocked" has not taken place.

I am RL is not as user: RoswithaC claims, however, one must admit, with RL to have had contact in order to listen to the views from there over the Tronfall.


From IAAL new and revised articles:

smell mark, color mark with patent attorney; talk: genetic markers for genetic markers; mark; Mitstörerhaftung (articles for Wikimedia Germany eV by user: Lung laundry ; deleted during the pendency deletion procedure).

From IAAL prepared items that still need to be adjusted to conform wikipedia (I 've only been here a few days, ie total beginner):

http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Benutzer:IAAL&diff=12640875&oldid=12618825
copyright. /. GNU Free Documentation License is interpreted as the copyright, if anyone as the creator of the work by the submit button ug agrees to the "GNU Free Documentation License" a Artikelveroeffentlichung, but then out at a later date from the copyright withdraw that consent? - IAAL 22:10, 14 January 2006 (CET)

pacta sunt servanda. - CDisconnect Talk 22:19, 14 January 2006 (UTC) I see now, I'm wrong here. Can you please in Wikipedia: Move copyright issues? Thank you. - IAAL 22:23, 14 January 2006 (CET)

Not necessary, but the question I have already answered. You can take action against the challenge with such contract, but then you would need a ground for rescission. Otherwise: pacta sunt servanda. - CDisconnect talk 22:26, 14 January 2006 (CET)


http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Diskussion% 3AUrheberrecht & diff = 12617567 & oldid = 12617299
http://de.wikipedia. org / w / index.php? title = Talk% 3AUrheberrecht & diff = 13085531 & oldid = 13085375

To restore the previous state

http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Benutzer:IAAL&diff=12640875&oldid=12618825
Thank you in advance for the completion of the complete lock-out. KH - IAAL 23:59, 15 January 2006 (CET)


Source: http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title = User_talk: Henriette_Fiebig

& diff = 13666927 & oldid = 13561203 #
Gegendarstellung_zu_ .22 User: IAAL_forever.22_
des_Benutzer: Markus_Schwei.C3.9F

Nevertheless, the

Admin Markus welding transrapid injured
based on a flat lie Iaal the record changed
. From this example we see how ill is the behavior on the Wikipedia - for which Wikipedia admins responsible with German residence and the Wikimedia Germany eV. FvMM says: If these guys say it all the time, had attacked the Wikipedia Iaal law (which is not true), then Iaal should do the same for once! We support this

Card Ideas For 20th Birthday

Wikipedia: Speechless decision including abuse


Constructive criticism helps to improve. In one of the comments shared a blog reader of FvMM group with something very interesting. Therefore, this bias is just about to be like totally speechless.

" The opinion of the Iaal

forced renaming process is clearly expressed in very clever and so would the Wikimedia outright on the tight spot that can not fulfill. However Iaal saw tactically early
presented
, "said Professor Tscharlie opposition cinema and refers to the following: " ... request: I request a decision about the blocking of User: IAAL for an indefinite period ... "

(

quote from the proposal Wikipedia: User lockout / IAAL , Henriette Fiebig)
Henriette Fiebig of the Wikimedia Germany eV requested (legitimately) only one decision and not an (illegal) blocking / renaming them as such. By comparison

"...
application: the user: Klever is for a period of 3 months
prohibited, requests for speedy deletion, deletion requests and to provide QA applications ... "

(

quote from the proposal Wikipedia: User lockout / Klever )
There in the Klever method was not applied for decision making, but a lockout. Further comparison

"...
request: I request a revocation of user: cyper for a period of 2 weeks
... "

(

quote from the proposal Wikipedia: User lockout / cyper )
Even in this cyber-procedure was No decision requested, but a two-week block. This suggests To close that never had a proper user blocking action against User: IAAL has taken place. . eighth

Please use your "
resistance cinema
" a bit more on the intricacies

,
FvMM
"says The FvMM Group: Yes, um, ... * Scratch head *. Then the request would do to a simple decision-a classic Troll application of Wikimedia Germany eV, because they provoke with such requests only public appearance and how things operate in Tron pure pine with sanctions. And transfer all
Pro-Voter
himself as a true trolls. And there are the Roswitha C. another "greatest Troll all Wikipedia-times": The 45 year old Markus
sweat from Bochum
u that without a proper user blocking procedure intentionally blocked. And the 39 year old brown silent erische Applicant Admin Henriette Fiebig from Berlin-Schnöneberg who went there just a tit for tat with the Iaal pillory and runs the same games with the names Sank pine, as it comes Tron already the whole time the case. A confused Cassander the Minoans is getting to the point : "The Wikipedia can provide such types, the fear, uncertainty and doubt, then do not really need." Update: A few minutes ago has service provider Admin Markus welding the User: IAAL again, "forever" locked. And again, without vote. And again Admin arbitrariness and abuse of the admin buttons by Mark

welding, although IAAL through suspension by Admin Steschke not at all on Wikipedia could be present. Update: has now transformed service provider Admin Markus welding the "User lock procedure" in a "
opinion
. And the whole process again closed without prior agreement. This is not only the department Wikipedia: opinion avoided but also the Wikipedia: Mediation Committee ignored. And the blocking procedure user anyway. And all though it is foreseen by the Wikipedia rules otherwise. New Admin arbitrariness and abuse of the admin buttons again with the south park moderate comments " opinion ended so forever barred" by Mark

welding.

Annabel Chong 251 Vid

Wikimedia blocks Günter Freiherr von Gravenreuth

The expanded board of Wikimedia Germany eV Mathias Schindler blocks Günter Freiherr von Gravenreuth. The oppressors do not want the decision of the Landgericht Bonn virtual house ban is known in the article. And the lawyer himself, it naturally does not know why the women gossip Association

the virtual house ban currently a hot topic in

is Zwangsumbennungsverfahren . As always is the Wikimedia Germany eV negatively with their own made Wikipedia yet again. An association for the promotion of free knowledge? Not likely. A club who deliberately does not meet in other places on the Wikipedia the association's purpose. It applies to abuse with a vengeance the admin buttons to bring their own association's interests in the German Wikipedia. Or to control. Or the Wikipedia for the benefit of the Heise publishing house to monitor

. Günter Freiherr von Gravenreuth and Heise, since the two have something in common. One wants the right of free speech make full use. The other may not. One does not want to be censored and implement Article 5 of the Basic Law in the comment in other ways. The other says, they want to decide for themselves who can to the right of free speech make use of. And so the two to bicker over the premises. To the virtual. And whenever it "does not

Virtual House ban" make this a decision of the District Court of Bonn is, Heise is allergic to it. But who now turns away from the two armed Hansel and simply turn to the Wikipedia, noting that there are at Wikipedia again two bicker. And again it is about the "Virtual House ban. Again also the same district court of Bonn. The tip of the iceberg is still tops it by again to go Günter Freiherr von Gravenreuth. One wants the right of free speech make use of. The Wikipedia may not and blocks Gravenreuth. And Gravenreuth will not be censored and will implement the Basic Law, Article 5 in the product creation opportunities in the Wikipedia. The women gossip

association says, they want to even determine who is allowed the right of free speech to make use of Wikipedia. Therefore has blocked the Extended Board of the Wikimedia Germany eV Mathias Schindler the Günter Freiherr von Gravenreuth . And so the two to bicker over the premises. To the virtual. As with the Heise Verlag. And whenever it "does not Virtual House ban" make this a decision of the District Court of Bonn is, both the Wikipedia and the Wikimedia allergic to it. Is not it strange when Heise, Wikimedia and Wikipedia are allergic to the district court of Bonn? If so many people are allergic to it and then censor so many people, then falls to the Wikipedia, the Insiders and nudge Once the mole at. Perhaps it is that is not to the lawyer Günter Freiherr von Gravenreuth. He wants to really "does not ban Virtual House" only for the purpose of "free knowledge" of this sentence make Wikipedia available. Actually, the project would make the text sympathetic donor. gives copyright protection to judicial decisions, namely the Law on grounds. Therefore, this voluntary commitment by the lawyer for Wikipedia regarded as laudable, namely, the Wikipedia - an encyclopedia for free knowledge - with a "virtual house prohibition does not" upgrade. But the Wikimedia Germany eV leads to top things off, to not fulfill the pledge at the District Court Berlin Purpose

. They want the thing with the "Virtual House prohibition does not apply" in the Commons not only have in it. It was also at the Mitstörerhaftung . And, even though it could be the Wikimedia Germany eV actually not the real owner of the German Wikipedia

. She 's always the proprietor when it comes to the obstinate and simplistic forms dependent Forms of the Wikipedia is. Or if certain contents are to be locked out, which sees the Heise-Verlag do not like the Wikipedia. There are the Wikipedia admins of the Wikimedia Germany eV quickly with their Admin buttons there. And censor as wild pack animals . What turn on this decision to ban virtual house ? The Insiders at Wikipedia have all noticed and because of these incidents the decision in the Insider Blog published . In theory, the FvMM group should now here the "address dealers

" Heise on Wikipedia take a close look . As fair, one should be so. But she has already latest done and sometimes that is later on a pair of their own blog entries. The Insiders have thought, but once Ter from the R archive to let go first. He wanted to before the conversion his blog divulge some very sensitive details about Heise. Maybe it's his Günni about him. The red carpet of the unübetreffbaren Insiders is in a dead straight line "R-archive" rolled out and plays with cheerful brass bands, the famous song: "Do i ', then, must i' for the shtetl addition, the shtetl out And you remain my treasure mole here. " We can not simply resist us grin . Update: The extended committee Mathias Schindler of the Wikimedia Germany eV has unblocked again. This is confirmed by the responses of
FvMM / IG to interview with Gravenreuth
once again that the Wikimedia Germany eV with their Admin rights least liable as Mitstörer. Goofy , bummer , on dööfsten .

Can I Get Four Holdalls In A A3 Sportwagon

LG Bonn: not one Virtual House ban

In a dispute about the virtual Domestic authority has the 10th Civil Chamber of the Landgericht Bonn Court ruled that the ban on virtual house does not count. The Wikimedia Germany eV - Society for the Promotion of "free knowledge" - has been trying for some time, with all possible means in particular with their Wikipedia admin rights this landmark decision on the Wikipedia, an encyclopedia for "free knowledge" to embezzle.

many Wikipedia authors and insiders have complained about the Pravda-like behavior . And many of them fear that "does not count Virtual House ban the abuse of the admin buttons by the Wikimedia Germany eV that decision to the public is not as well known. For this reason, go into the dreaded Wikipedia Insiders -
if it is censored in Wikipedia
- as always the other way around before: the decision LG Bonn on 10 November 1999 with the trade number 10 O 457/99 here will now be published until all legal . Landgericht Bonn - http://www.lg-bonn.nrw.de/ LG Bonn, Judgement of 10th November 1999 - 10 O 457/99 "Virtual House Rules "

ON BEHALF OF THE PEOPLE


JUDGEMENT

first An application for the injunction is dismissed. second The cost of the procedure with the plaintiff. third The decision is provisionally enforceable. The plaintiff may avoid the enforcement because of the cost against security services in the amount of 2,500.00 DM, if the defendant previously available to provide the same level security.


Grounds


An application for an interlocutory injunction is allowed, in particular the courts to local jurisdiction. The jurisdiction derives from § 32 ZPO. It is accepted law that instrumental in tort as well as the acts are committed Erfolgsort is when are realized by the success of admission constituent elements, without which the tort would not be realized (Smid: Musielak, Code of Civil Procedure, 1999, § , 32, para 16).. Here comes the success of the alleged wrongful act by the applicant available - the use of chat software despite the prohibition of use - at the place where you want the the server is playing up with the chat software. This server is not disputed in the district of the forum district court of Bonn.

The request but has no success on the merits. The plaintiff did not claim the alleged disposal of any substantiated argument and substantiated. It cites against the Defendant on her "virtual property", so it is obvious the rules on the ownership in any event be applied accordingly. An injunction against the Defendant pursuant to § 1004 Civil Code of the applicant, however, not available. She has not shown that the Defendant's chat software used illegally, which would have the condition that it would be pronounced by it is prohibited to use law. If the plaintiff believes it can rule as desired by individual users of its chat software, this is incorrect, according to the chamber. You must admit though, that the owners moved in principle to his cause at will and exclude others from the action can. This principle is however subject to the condition that the rights of third parties are not against it (§ 903 BGB). With respect to the entering of buildings, it is recognized that the owner is generally free to decide whom he granted access to his property. It is different however, if it as a business for the general public access to open and expresses its intention to provide services to each customer. He issued in these cases and, waiving an examination in each case an access authority to the extent the visitors, especially by disturbances in the operating procedure, is no reason to exclude him from this power again (BGH NJW 1994, 188 fmwN). From the point of the ban contradictory behavior of the owner of a bond formed at the access authority, which forbids him to exercise his right house at random (Christensen, fact checking in supermarkets and domestic ban, JuS 1996, 873 [874]. Not

different are here:.. The applicant shall provide their offer to use its free IM software to all users of the Internet, special access controls do not take place also little binding conditions are formulated under which the use is permitted. Unless the plaintiff has argued, the user must accept the so-called "Chattiquette" where it concerns "etiquette" is not apparent that it provisions are included for using the service binding . regulate Was thus for the chat software, a general authority to use, should not the plaintiff by the arbitrary exercise of their "virtual property" that the Defendant again . Escape Compared with the express prohibition of use, he could appeal the ban contradictory behavior in accordance with § 242 BGB.

would be different only if the plaintiff would have had grounds for exclusion, such as an interruption of the operation or that the defendant provided the software is not under the above , would have used usual "chatter behavior.

Such reasons, however, has the plaintiff in spite of the mention Decision of Appeal of 05.11.1999 (pages 12 dA) is not submitted or made credible, it has rather limited to the claim that it threatens not quantifiable damage, because addressed various master-chatter of the Defendant unworthy felt. This presentation is shown at a standard rate, mean that it can emerge as a ground for exclusion and therefore irrelevant. It would have required the presentation of concrete facts, which users have felt offended by that statement, so that even one was present for the Defendant unrequitable lecture. But

even if the manager of the applicant available in the oral proceedings on 12.11.1999 has made, either to disputes between the Defendant and another chatter under the pseudonym (... ) come to the chamber can be found in the no reason which would entitle the plaintiff to the exclusion of the Defendant. To damage the operating procedure of the chat would be affected, it has not argued this is not otherwise apparent. It is also - also taking into account of the date for the hearing, presented "Chat live recording", 19.10.1999 (pages 48 fda) - does not appear that the communication behavior of the Defendant outside the "usual chatter behavior moves "and thus granted by the general use of power would no longer covers. In the recording of a verbal confrontation between the Defendant under the pseudonym (...) and (...) is documented. The applicant has provided the probable cause statement that it also conflicts between other users of the chat come is not in dispute. But if it could come between the individual users to disputes, is not clear why precisely the involvement of the Defendant in such, as evidenced by the significantly advanced the recordings also from the other under the nick name (...) active users were a general of the usage right should not represent more muted performance. In that regard, can the applicant have helped to not talk on your success, it was their long-term goal, a certain level of communication to establish itself as the inevitable default. Apart from the fact that this statement is again too general, can the board a "designated Level "that is otherwise in the instant communication available, as presented in part by the applicant available (pages 42 dA), not apparent.

Furthermore, it is not apparent that the use of chat software from another line and was thus not covered under a different IP address to use with a different nickname from the general right of use. The registry is to use anonymous seen all what the user is a must, to choose a nickname and a password. Which computer, below which IP address it then uses to access, he is free and is just one of the features of the global computer network that represents the Internet. n "- comparable to the access selection in a nightclub - for, this is incorrect: it is the user of the chat software available to the applicant - this is known to the court - free to choose any number of nicknames and each freely under attend a pseudonym in the chat. The dial-in with a different nickname is thus also is not a behavior that would not be covered by the general use of power. Had the plaintiff wish to avoid this, it would have been free to organize access to their chat to, such that they Passwords or the nicknames configured not arbitrary, but it would have made for access condition that the user at least give her full respect to his real name and other data to identify and then all the known users access to only allow a pseudonym. This would have her open the possibility of an "undesirable" users will actually - at least in the technical sense - effectively excluded from using the chat software. That they did not choose this path, can not cause the behavior of those who as part of the move from the available options granted to Siemens, in retrospect, be regarded as unlawful.

Finally, contrary to what the applicant provided no evidence that the Defendant against protective legislation within the meaning of § 823 para 2 BGB has failed. Complained of by their "access surreptitiously" where neither the Teleservices Act, which regulates only the responsibility of those who make the content available in Internet, you can still § 265 a StGB - obtaining of benefits - Relevant. The acquisition is part of the chat with a different pseudonym shows no illegal alteration of data, such as defined in Penal Code § § 268 f. dar. Further suitable protection laws are also not evident.

Lag including as a result of the expressed by the applicant available to "virtual house ban" not an objective reason could, according to the Defendant on the other hand, the prohibition of contradictory behavior § ; called 242 BGB. He thus a counter-law was over from the the property rights flowing the available applicant under § 903 BGB. His continued use of the chat software was not illegal, it was that based on Civil Code § 1004 claim must be rejected to grant the injunction.

the costs follows from § 91 para 1 CCP, the decision on provisional enforceability is based on § § 708 No. 11, 711 ZPO.

Claims: 12.500, - €


http://www.jurawelt.com/gerichtsurteile/5156

How To Clean A Resin White G Shock

Hacker vs. Cracker: Perfect timing


Some Insiders are members of Wikipedia in the Wikimedia Germany eV, but that does not yet know the Crackers. The General Assembly will take place on Saturday 25 February 2006 by 13 clock in the house of the youth in Frankfurt am Main. The Hackers are pleased with a quiet smile on the elections board and the CEO Club decision.

found on Saturday in the Wikimedia Board elections. On that day shall also be decided whether the Wikimedia Germany eV is occupied with a future CEO. For this, the statutes are changed. If the majority of the members of this change , May decide the job will be published. But at the Wikimedia Germany eV is as so often

exactly reversed: it anticipates the decision of 25.02.2006 members and publishes the job as early as the 02/13/2006 on the Internet and at the same time in the weekend edition of the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (

FAZ) of 18./19.02.2006. A patent attorney Wikimedia compared this thing with an "attack from behind" and showed the FvMM group for comparing a protocol from another club with which to proceed properly, step by step had . A further reason for
deprivation of legal capacity
the Wikimedia Germany eV? If the members of my opposition to commercialization, a real profit to stay association, then these two anticipated actions caused substantial costs for the job. With the current "illegal" jobs of course will also include applications and these applications must of course be one way or even sent back to candidates. Here again fall unnecessary costs on. Perhaps applying one of Memmi friends as managing director of Wikimedia Germany eV? Payment under the Federal Employees' Collective (BAT IIa ) included. Then the inside work would be here on this blog paid for it. And remember that once again something of the Wikimedia. But perhaps precisely because of the application of the mole already friends outside. Maybe not, after being caught now also board member, Christian Thiele of the Wikimedia Germany eV for a Wikipedia hack. Cracker JD leaves too many traces. How about once, the hard drive

scratch to brush, JD? Maybe the rabbit is running quite different. For example, that the application to the District Court of Berlin because of the deprivation of legal capacity until Monday, which will be submitted 2/27/2006? Then, the Wikimedia on Saturday, 02/25/2006
actually free hit
. For the need of women gossip club already meet again to obtain shared with the members of a new club decision. You would in this case from there again from all over Europe come to a place. And again hostel beds in the "House of Youth" book. Perhaps, the old guy for this weekend already booked on 25/02/2006 beds and may not for me to stay there. For example, if it would be illegal without youth hostel card to stay still in the House of youth. Perhaps this kind of squatting trespassing or even the peace ? Overnight accommodation in a hostel with no identification? Overnight accommodation in a hostel on the pretext of a club membership card of the Wikimedia? The Wikimedia Germany eV claims for an overnight stay in the hostel one needs no hostel card, because you have only just a member of Wikimedia Germany eV to be. If the hostel for these purposes
zwangsumbenannt
? sniff Perhaps the friends of the mole this time the competent supervisory authority, whether it is permissible, at the expense of the youth authority to Vereinsauweisen parasitic ? What would really happen to all the youth hostels in Germany, when all clubs would handle that? Or is it about the public money available to cover the tax payer? And the real young people who have to resort to an expensive hotel or sleep under the bridge because it has the stingy Wikimedia Germany eV booked the whole hostel in Frankfurt? Perhaps these kinds of frivolous nights're not frivolous, but because the Wikimedia Germany eV is a kindergarten association that consists entirely of young people left behind? Youth from a youth club in Berlin's Kreuzberg district in which the squatters want to stay in Frankfurt, cheap or even free? As the purpose of the association for free Penner and eat the bread of the hostel included?

is perhaps the request for withdrawal of legal capacity exactly on 25 February 2006 by 13 clock with the district court filed Berlin, where it just starts at the same time the General Assembly of Wikimedia in Frankfurt? And the friends say from which the mole not smile all the time? Perhaps, however, goes out the application before? Perhaps womöglicherweise the application is already gone out the latest? Germany and the Wikimedia silent once more out to the members?

Perhaps the 2/25/2006 blog entry for the written already, but set in software so that the blog entry exactly right on 2/25/2006 at exactly 13:00 clock shows up here? The Friends of the mole would then have an alibi. But this is the perfect timing of Wikipedia Insiders with exactly 13 clock 00 minutes and 00 seconds not so noticeable, is the blog entry out of it then just clock at 13:18? Perhaps there is a coup on Saturday at Wikimedia meet? And therefore there is no live broadcast of the event via Webcam for the purpose of free knowledge ? Perhaps it's hot, restore, if welding
Markus
also there and at home can Roswitha C. again her Scottish husband
Nymala
? Maybe dressing up Markus welding this carnival Saturday as bulkheads and with no panties as Roswitha's husband is doing it? The Hackers are pleased with a quiet smile on this 25th February 2006.

Police Auctions Wyndham

Wikimedia: deprivation of legal capacity I

A local court in Berlin registered association must comply by law, for example, the association's purpose. This is not the case, the official court records to be deleted. Why a copy of a document in this blog? Just because.

sufficient for enforcement on the assets of an unincorporated association a judgment against the association Judgement (§ 735 ZPO). A club that is not quite ready can be sued, in the case of the association the position of an unincorporated association (§ 50 para 2 CCP).

§ 43 BGB "deprivation of legal capacity"

(1) The association may be deprived of legal capacity, if it jeopardized by an illegal decision of the General Assembly or by unlawful conduct of the Executive Board the common good .

(2) An association whose purpose under the statute is not aimed at a commercial business operation, can the legal capacity to be withdrawn if such a purpose. (4) An association whose legal capacity is based on presentation, the legal capacity to be withdrawn if a person other than the purpose pursued in the statute.


§ 74 BGB "resolution"


(3) is withdrawn from the association on the basis of § 43 BGB legal capacity, shall be registered as indicated by the competent authority.

So much for Part 1 of FvMM new series while Wikipedia admin Wikimedia Germany eV "
society to free knowledge
" called
Daniel Baur
aka " DAB. "in-thing at RoswithaC Achim Raschka a link to the source for free non-censored knowledge. Part 2 follows. Promised.

Cruises Going To Africa

Wikipedia: in favor of the outhouse Wikirena

has about 24 hours ago caught Mole Memmi, together with the ex-Wikipolizisten the Wikipedia admin and censor-Tron named "JD". And JD has not even notice when he has his voice in pro-Henriette Fiebig given user name change process. Markus has also welded the same miterwischt yet. Au Backe.

The Friends of Memmi it could not at first believe that just "JD" on 20.02.2006 at 01:32 the clock

84.60.128.234 (dslb-084-060-128-234.pools.arcor- ip.net) Arcor Germany used. The record here agreed exactly with the version of 19 February 2006 at 15:54 clock match, as JD has given in, which takes place before any public incitement and harassment procedures in of Wikipedia's per voice.

That should bring in some of the Tron thing to light, love 84.60.128.234 aka the big Gladiator JD in Wikirena. Now the pants are down. Human Mole children uh, ladies and gentlemen! Welcome! Are you still here in this sensational investigative journalism, the Wikipedia paparazzi. It does not take long and already there is again a new blog entry. About "JD" of course. So easy here the wind blows in terms of Tron. And has until such time as Tron family disappears from the Wikipedia just as it decided the European Court
so in cases like Mrs. L.
and are very much the desire of Tron's family members to their privacy re protected. Game over, Gladiator JD. Killed in the Wikirena in the outhouse.

Gigabyte S-series Best Graphics Card

Wikiprawda: You will zwangsumbenannt!

Ah, menno, Wikimedia Germany with your Wikipedia. Why only she is on, the name "Iaal" as allergic and performs a forced name change here? With a publicly advertised process, incitement against a Iaal it is first of all, to block the user name. And, although Iaal has done nothing else to sell them as correct predictions, which could have been avoided.

On 13 January 2006 at 14:32 clock Iaal reported in to the Wikipedia. Only 50 hours and 19 minutes later, the user name from the Wikipedia from beginner Wikipedia-service provider Markus sweat like forever locked. Forever and without prior consultation and without prior consultation process as is typical of the Wikiprawda. Justification by Markus sweat. "Iaal? He is a lawyer! Help, "and sashayed already fully automatically, the fake" Wikipedia threaten with legal action "in the lock database inside the Commons. Oh no, while only the back to lead again. Wikimedia Germany, is a membership organization that promotes free knowledge with forced name changes and wants to hammer and all lawyers in this way to flee.

But Iaal had asked not only to publish his reply , but also a solemn oath made that he never attacked the Wikipedia. On the contrary: Because of the clear legal

in
Tron thing
feared Iaal a restraining order and tried to warn both the purposes of free knowledge Wikipedia and the Wikimedia Germany eV. Actually, he is likely because of the ex-Nazi law called "Law on Legal Advice," but he took the risk to the community in purchasing. Wikimedia ignored the warning of the intelligent Seer, and in the meantime, this warning by Alexander Klimke and Arnomane been deleted. About a week later, then the fact of the district court injunction issued against the Wikimedia Berlin. What a disgrace for all the so-so clever redenen lawyers and lawyers of Wikipedia. If they start talking all been so smart, they would have left at least one Schutzschrift so as not to get the professional indemnity insurance problems. Also they have at the expense of the donor fund overslept. True, women still
Treasurer
? But Wikipedia-service provider has blocked sweat the Admin Markus Iaal and now to these seers legend are zwangsumbenannt. Namely, how often the free knowledge but not to promote and meet once again not the purpose of the association of Wikimedia Germany eV. The one must first imagine: first predictor block forever, then he is a legend and then he will zwangsumbenannt him back to the Pirates, sailing under the flag ship of fools under the leadership Captain Morgain
Anneke Wolf
purely forward. What a crap of the Wikiprawda ! Overall, a clear case of prohibited sun Admin arbitrariness and abuse of the admin buttons in connection with a defamation and criminal data change by the accused Markus sweat. It takes place on the Wikipedia and some even come from the Wikimedia Germany eV

supported. Just a day later after the data change from then on 20.02.2006 19.02.2006 confessed Markus sweat, that it's actually not a user lock, but about a forced name change. Iaal supposed to set a different user name: That was the prediction of
Iaal no nonsense, actually showed the
injunction granted and the other preliminary injunction against Wikimedia is still not lifted. "Wikimedia is an international nonprofit organization that is dedicated to the task, the knowledge of humanity to all people in the world to make it accessible," said the biggest bluff of all Wikipedia times of the Wikimedia Germany eV , a society for free and no one may know

about the injunctions anything . Wikiprawda how it lives. The Image Problem is currently estimating and not later than the bankruptcy they are away from the window. Now, however, the legend Iaal be zwangsumbenannt yet. The project, Wikipedia is now also known by the relevant Markus sweat seriously damaged. For this purpose the Wikimedia Germany has an application made retroactive to User Lock (!) - To take a vote rather than the community as to whether the forced renaming
Iaal
is permitted. Why not the same throughout the criminal Bunch kick and well isses? No, the irresponsible people are to the admin buttons such as Dirk Ingo Franke aka South Park and Markus sweat - how different it should be in the Wikiprawda - get away scot-free, of course, once more . So it's not about blocking a user, but a pure propaganda for an illegal and bullying procedures. Interesting this: § § 823 , 1004 BGB analog. Memmi, the mole and an ex-Wikipolizist have incurred can be anything. All the people that illegal in this process vote for a "pro-forced name change," snapped one with their IP addresses to them later for
Contacts section
to come out . This should then also for the Tron thing and still get the actionable right to pursue some days. Let's take these wild animals the lawyers to be devoured. The bureaucrats Stefan Kühn and Admin Michael Diederich with their forced renaming rights enforcement also the same time.

Noc Wife From Housband

Wikipedia: Wikimedia covered up crime

Who on the Wikipedia Crime committed and so threatened the project of Wikipedia, has lost basically nothing on the Wikipedia. Thus the view of several blog readers in the comments. That sounds right and just as logical as such when it is dark during the day light and at night. But not so with the Wikimedia Germany eV. There is just the opposite. Or rather, through frivolous twilight. Now was a hit again by the Wikimedia. This time: aka Daniel Baur from the Technical University of Darmstadt "DAB.".

it were not for the Wikimedia Germany eV, there would be no members. If there were no members, there would not be the Wikimedia Member Daniel Baur

. But it should not be. The reasons should be clear: Daniel Baur as DAB. is "a member of Wikimedia Germany, and also as service providers

administrator at the German Wikipedia. And in the interest of the Wikimedia Baur Germany tried to disappear on 19/02/2006 at 23:18 clock reporting a crime - instead he removed his admin buttons with the reported crime on the Wikipedia and thanks for pointing to as well the reputation of the Technical University Darmstadt to meet. The offense is the situation on 19.02.2006 for more than 24 hours online and the message was this swept under the table. Perhaps short for the many new blog readers. There are people who run the vandalism on Wikipedia, by committing crimes on Wikipedia. For example sedition, in which the content of Wikipedia banned slogans, text or Nazi symbols be filled. This is evil and in the German Wikipedia is such a fantastic filling illegal content on the Dutch 145.97.39.155 computer That within the European Union (EU) is

. Hence so is the EU law. The already proved the journal " seizure of the German Wikipedia? "there with the photographic evidence. And that a "real" Delete on the intelligence unit "Wikipedia: Vandal blocking" in general does not take place, for example, shows the following case of Daniel Baur aka of the TU Darmstadt "DAB." On 19 February 2006 at 00:58 clock was at the German Wikipedia by RoswithaC the personal life and intelligence sector at the expense of Henriette Fiebig violated, is punishable under § 201 StGB . It was this threat committed in connection with the
§ 74a StGB
the seizure of the computer with the the offense is. On 19/02/2006 at 18:00 of the clock was this blog entry. Nothing happened for many hours until 23:30 clock. refused, despite knowledge of this offense is many admins of Wikipedia to eliminate the violation of the law RoswithaC . To an anonymous blog reader, the collar exploded, she / he hinsurfte even for Wikipedia and vandalism in the specially appointed section "Wikipedia: Vandal blocking" reported. By now, some of the 190 service provider as admin by law obliged to remedy the violation. Remove? Error. It is just the opposite. The member of Wikimedia Germany eV Admin
Daniel Baur
"DAB." Destroyed the display of the blog reader while allowing the violation of RoswithaC want. And because blog readers are Christian Rohweder for facts and evidence cries, he may like the colorful exclusive photos again this time here: (Source: February 19, 2006 23:18 CET clock
)
http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title = Wikipedia% 3AVandalensperrung & diff = 13870465 & oldid = 13870238

This technical measure makes it possible for the crime report on the main page of the " Wikipedia: Vandals blocking
appears no longer only. Only with this Internet address - if, for example, as the
Insiders
of Wikipedia's knows - can be "deleted" content on the Wikipedia but ultimately recalled. Or if you know how the back door of the "History " yet again come to the "deleted" contents. For prosecution, this insider information can be very revealing: A real deleting content that is found normally take place not at 145.97 and they are still on the Dutch . 39 155 computer within and outside the EU common. And so it goes all the time. They are merely trying to cover up. Be it evil Sedition, be it pornographic material, it is all the slander and insults, the numerous data protection and privacy rights violations and whatever. The German Criminal Code through the entire bank. This 190 service provider which - such as Dirk Ingo Franke ,
Anneke Wolf
, Daniel Baur , Jan Henning , Markus welding - mainly drive have a German resident of this Vertuschspielchen also vorsä tzlich with and say, German law do not count for them . decisions of Judge of the Federal Court are only "cause-related incurred Troll article (see Talk: Tron (hacker)) without any scientific terms or just-right " says the Wikipedia Admin service provider Lung in its opinion. It would be interesting to know how many illegal content will be circulated clandestinely here in this way still world. Also, how many injured, lawyers, prosecutors and judges already on this bluff
of women gossip club called
Wikimedia Germany eV have fallen. The Dutch 145.97.39.155 computer , the wellspring for illegal spreads all over the world. A computer on the Wikimedia 190 with Wikipedia administrators as a responsible service provider access rights, management rights, enforcement rights, fire or other rights has . A computer that sits on a powder keg and when it comes to a lot of money. A time bomb, because it is also only a matter of time before the main prosecutor is formed after the Judicature Act and the German Wikipedia from all crimes, criminals and the state aid payable Service provider cleans. know the friends of the mole, why most of the 190 service provider their statutory and legal warnings and just refuse. The parties engaged in nearly 190 have something to hide and think they can behind the anonymity of Wikipedia hide . As well, there is the mole Memmi, who helps to clean up this scandalous mess. The same applies to the criminal file RoswithaC , the violation is still at Wikipedia online. And Jimmy Wales in

-Tron thing a letter of formal notice in the trash Iaals thrown, ignored the injunction from the district court of Berlin and Tron family name with the state from 20.02.2006 also still online. Jimbo & 190 German elephants, which brings a lot of trouble in a china shop. Because only 7 letters .

Bottom Four Teeth Are See Through

RoswithaC: catfight with seizures

A prison sentence of up to three years or a fine will be imposed on anyone who illegally is not publicly spoken words of another to a third party makes available on Wikipedia. The devices that used the persons who for the crime can be confiscated be. The talk is of Roswitha C. and their computer they used as one of the biggest trolls on the Wikipedia for such offenses.

really should at this point a blog entry about the love affair between RoswithaC

and Wikipedia admin Mark sweat what the eight nine-Ling Sisters of the Mole already
vorberichteten
. A classic theme for a gossip or tabloid newspaper about the shameless cheating of unsuspecting husbands find it RoswithaC married just a miserly Scotsman named Nymala is. And in turn presented to the Commons without underpants. lacked But in the big puzzle about all the crimes on the Wikipedia to the criminal data suppressions the Wikipedia admins Markus welding
nor the Criminal Code, part of the puzzle to
RoswithaC . For match and a feather flock together, they say so under gangster. Although could RoswithaC the defamation be shown that the lawyers they Iaal a criminal copyright infringement imputed for blackout purposes and then the evidence together with the cross-defendants Markus welding destroyed secretly. For the seizure of computers from RoswithaC and Markus sweat was not enough to do so, a V-man. to the effort of the Friends of the mole, as much evidence around the Tron case archive - for example, including death threats because of the and
Announcements
of property damage at the expense Trons parents - is not coincidental findings on the Wikipedia have been in vain for other . Now was RoswithaC caught in the act and the trol celled cat is Bag: violation of the confidentiality of the word, served a criminal offense under Penal Code § 201 , including § 74a StGB on the silver serving tray of prosecutor : (Source: RoswithaC, February 19, 2006 00:00 58
(CET);
http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title = User_talk: Henriette_Fiebig & diff = prev & oldid = 13839652

RoswithaC course was addressed to , but she refuses to eliminate this crime as it is so typical for the German Wikipedia. The violation is related to the update 02.19.2006 at 18:00 clock still
online. Asked about the motive and justification, said RoswithaC, they know the Iaal lawyer Christian Alber of Stuttgart since 1995 and in those 11 years they would definitely make in a position to form an opinion.

What a wicked Iaal ("I am a lawyer) must probably be disseminated as many bad false statements of fact, the world RoswithaC about Wikipedia. A few weeks ago and felt RoswithaC Markus sweat, or pursued by Rechtsanwalt Iaal Müller from Cologne . "You see, so be on what I'm doing here professionally," the next

of RoswithaC Flirt with Martin Steinmetz Iaal pass to the next Iaal on Wikipedia spy . "Yummy, thanks," and neither her husband Scottish still Markus welding something noticed by their numerous side affairs on the Wikipedia. It is not surprising if they get all the German bar associations and Wikimedia Germany eV as many legal problems and disadvantages by using other Iaals RoswithaC and Markus welding anti-competitive be. Of persecution as a motive for the numerous crimes on the Wikipedia, the prosecutor will not allow any event to impress when the Wikimedia Germany eV first to publish the IP numbers forces. Or will the prosecutor can perhaps Alexander Klimke aka " Berlin-Jurist ," Ex-Prosecutor Berlin, former State Office for State Protection and Ex-employees influence of the Federal Ministry of Interior? An agent with significant capabilities and a corresponding influence. DC
around the corner
: A twilight Wikimedia Germany eV and a mafia German Wikipedia middle of the catfight. It is clearly to too much money , fame and power . The Friends of the mole stay on the ball