Annabel Chong 251 Vid

Wikimedia blocks Günter Freiherr von Gravenreuth

The expanded board of Wikimedia Germany eV Mathias Schindler blocks Günter Freiherr von Gravenreuth. The oppressors do not want the decision of the Landgericht Bonn virtual house ban is known in the article. And the lawyer himself, it naturally does not know why the women gossip Association

the virtual house ban currently a hot topic in

is Zwangsumbennungsverfahren . As always is the Wikimedia Germany eV negatively with their own made Wikipedia yet again. An association for the promotion of free knowledge? Not likely. A club who deliberately does not meet in other places on the Wikipedia the association's purpose. It applies to abuse with a vengeance the admin buttons to bring their own association's interests in the German Wikipedia. Or to control. Or the Wikipedia for the benefit of the Heise publishing house to monitor

. Günter Freiherr von Gravenreuth and Heise, since the two have something in common. One wants the right of free speech make full use. The other may not. One does not want to be censored and implement Article 5 of the Basic Law in the comment in other ways. The other says, they want to decide for themselves who can to the right of free speech make use of. And so the two to bicker over the premises. To the virtual. And whenever it "does not

Virtual House ban" make this a decision of the District Court of Bonn is, Heise is allergic to it. But who now turns away from the two armed Hansel and simply turn to the Wikipedia, noting that there are at Wikipedia again two bicker. And again it is about the "Virtual House ban. Again also the same district court of Bonn. The tip of the iceberg is still tops it by again to go Günter Freiherr von Gravenreuth. One wants the right of free speech make use of. The Wikipedia may not and blocks Gravenreuth. And Gravenreuth will not be censored and will implement the Basic Law, Article 5 in the product creation opportunities in the Wikipedia. The women gossip

association says, they want to even determine who is allowed the right of free speech to make use of Wikipedia. Therefore has blocked the Extended Board of the Wikimedia Germany eV Mathias Schindler the Günter Freiherr von Gravenreuth . And so the two to bicker over the premises. To the virtual. As with the Heise Verlag. And whenever it "does not Virtual House ban" make this a decision of the District Court of Bonn is, both the Wikipedia and the Wikimedia allergic to it. Is not it strange when Heise, Wikimedia and Wikipedia are allergic to the district court of Bonn? If so many people are allergic to it and then censor so many people, then falls to the Wikipedia, the Insiders and nudge Once the mole at. Perhaps it is that is not to the lawyer Günter Freiherr von Gravenreuth. He wants to really "does not ban Virtual House" only for the purpose of "free knowledge" of this sentence make Wikipedia available. Actually, the project would make the text sympathetic donor. gives copyright protection to judicial decisions, namely the Law on grounds. Therefore, this voluntary commitment by the lawyer for Wikipedia regarded as laudable, namely, the Wikipedia - an encyclopedia for free knowledge - with a "virtual house prohibition does not" upgrade. But the Wikimedia Germany eV leads to top things off, to not fulfill the pledge at the District Court Berlin Purpose

. They want the thing with the "Virtual House prohibition does not apply" in the Commons not only have in it. It was also at the Mitstörerhaftung . And, even though it could be the Wikimedia Germany eV actually not the real owner of the German Wikipedia

. She 's always the proprietor when it comes to the obstinate and simplistic forms dependent Forms of the Wikipedia is. Or if certain contents are to be locked out, which sees the Heise-Verlag do not like the Wikipedia. There are the Wikipedia admins of the Wikimedia Germany eV quickly with their Admin buttons there. And censor as wild pack animals . What turn on this decision to ban virtual house ? The Insiders at Wikipedia have all noticed and because of these incidents the decision in the Insider Blog published . In theory, the FvMM group should now here the "address dealers

" Heise on Wikipedia take a close look . As fair, one should be so. But she has already latest done and sometimes that is later on a pair of their own blog entries. The Insiders have thought, but once Ter from the R archive to let go first. He wanted to before the conversion his blog divulge some very sensitive details about Heise. Maybe it's his Günni about him. The red carpet of the unübetreffbaren Insiders is in a dead straight line "R-archive" rolled out and plays with cheerful brass bands, the famous song: "Do i ', then, must i' for the shtetl addition, the shtetl out And you remain my treasure mole here. " We can not simply resist us grin . Update: The extended committee Mathias Schindler of the Wikimedia Germany eV has unblocked again. This is confirmed by the responses of
FvMM / IG to interview with Gravenreuth
once again that the Wikimedia Germany eV with their Admin rights least liable as Mitstörer. Goofy , bummer , on dööfsten .

Can I Get Four Holdalls In A A3 Sportwagon

LG Bonn: not one Virtual House ban

In a dispute about the virtual Domestic authority has the 10th Civil Chamber of the Landgericht Bonn Court ruled that the ban on virtual house does not count. The Wikimedia Germany eV - Society for the Promotion of "free knowledge" - has been trying for some time, with all possible means in particular with their Wikipedia admin rights this landmark decision on the Wikipedia, an encyclopedia for "free knowledge" to embezzle.

many Wikipedia authors and insiders have complained about the Pravda-like behavior . And many of them fear that "does not count Virtual House ban the abuse of the admin buttons by the Wikimedia Germany eV that decision to the public is not as well known. For this reason, go into the dreaded Wikipedia Insiders -
if it is censored in Wikipedia
- as always the other way around before: the decision LG Bonn on 10 November 1999 with the trade number 10 O 457/99 here will now be published until all legal . Landgericht Bonn - http://www.lg-bonn.nrw.de/ LG Bonn, Judgement of 10th November 1999 - 10 O 457/99 "Virtual House Rules "

ON BEHALF OF THE PEOPLE


JUDGEMENT

first An application for the injunction is dismissed. second The cost of the procedure with the plaintiff. third The decision is provisionally enforceable. The plaintiff may avoid the enforcement because of the cost against security services in the amount of 2,500.00 DM, if the defendant previously available to provide the same level security.


Grounds


An application for an interlocutory injunction is allowed, in particular the courts to local jurisdiction. The jurisdiction derives from § 32 ZPO. It is accepted law that instrumental in tort as well as the acts are committed Erfolgsort is when are realized by the success of admission constituent elements, without which the tort would not be realized (Smid: Musielak, Code of Civil Procedure, 1999, § , 32, para 16).. Here comes the success of the alleged wrongful act by the applicant available - the use of chat software despite the prohibition of use - at the place where you want the the server is playing up with the chat software. This server is not disputed in the district of the forum district court of Bonn.

The request but has no success on the merits. The plaintiff did not claim the alleged disposal of any substantiated argument and substantiated. It cites against the Defendant on her "virtual property", so it is obvious the rules on the ownership in any event be applied accordingly. An injunction against the Defendant pursuant to § 1004 Civil Code of the applicant, however, not available. She has not shown that the Defendant's chat software used illegally, which would have the condition that it would be pronounced by it is prohibited to use law. If the plaintiff believes it can rule as desired by individual users of its chat software, this is incorrect, according to the chamber. You must admit though, that the owners moved in principle to his cause at will and exclude others from the action can. This principle is however subject to the condition that the rights of third parties are not against it (§ 903 BGB). With respect to the entering of buildings, it is recognized that the owner is generally free to decide whom he granted access to his property. It is different however, if it as a business for the general public access to open and expresses its intention to provide services to each customer. He issued in these cases and, waiving an examination in each case an access authority to the extent the visitors, especially by disturbances in the operating procedure, is no reason to exclude him from this power again (BGH NJW 1994, 188 fmwN). From the point of the ban contradictory behavior of the owner of a bond formed at the access authority, which forbids him to exercise his right house at random (Christensen, fact checking in supermarkets and domestic ban, JuS 1996, 873 [874]. Not

different are here:.. The applicant shall provide their offer to use its free IM software to all users of the Internet, special access controls do not take place also little binding conditions are formulated under which the use is permitted. Unless the plaintiff has argued, the user must accept the so-called "Chattiquette" where it concerns "etiquette" is not apparent that it provisions are included for using the service binding . regulate Was thus for the chat software, a general authority to use, should not the plaintiff by the arbitrary exercise of their "virtual property" that the Defendant again . Escape Compared with the express prohibition of use, he could appeal the ban contradictory behavior in accordance with § 242 BGB.

would be different only if the plaintiff would have had grounds for exclusion, such as an interruption of the operation or that the defendant provided the software is not under the above , would have used usual "chatter behavior.

Such reasons, however, has the plaintiff in spite of the mention Decision of Appeal of 05.11.1999 (pages 12 dA) is not submitted or made credible, it has rather limited to the claim that it threatens not quantifiable damage, because addressed various master-chatter of the Defendant unworthy felt. This presentation is shown at a standard rate, mean that it can emerge as a ground for exclusion and therefore irrelevant. It would have required the presentation of concrete facts, which users have felt offended by that statement, so that even one was present for the Defendant unrequitable lecture. But

even if the manager of the applicant available in the oral proceedings on 12.11.1999 has made, either to disputes between the Defendant and another chatter under the pseudonym (... ) come to the chamber can be found in the no reason which would entitle the plaintiff to the exclusion of the Defendant. To damage the operating procedure of the chat would be affected, it has not argued this is not otherwise apparent. It is also - also taking into account of the date for the hearing, presented "Chat live recording", 19.10.1999 (pages 48 fda) - does not appear that the communication behavior of the Defendant outside the "usual chatter behavior moves "and thus granted by the general use of power would no longer covers. In the recording of a verbal confrontation between the Defendant under the pseudonym (...) and (...) is documented. The applicant has provided the probable cause statement that it also conflicts between other users of the chat come is not in dispute. But if it could come between the individual users to disputes, is not clear why precisely the involvement of the Defendant in such, as evidenced by the significantly advanced the recordings also from the other under the nick name (...) active users were a general of the usage right should not represent more muted performance. In that regard, can the applicant have helped to not talk on your success, it was their long-term goal, a certain level of communication to establish itself as the inevitable default. Apart from the fact that this statement is again too general, can the board a "designated Level "that is otherwise in the instant communication available, as presented in part by the applicant available (pages 42 dA), not apparent.

Furthermore, it is not apparent that the use of chat software from another line and was thus not covered under a different IP address to use with a different nickname from the general right of use. The registry is to use anonymous seen all what the user is a must, to choose a nickname and a password. Which computer, below which IP address it then uses to access, he is free and is just one of the features of the global computer network that represents the Internet. n "- comparable to the access selection in a nightclub - for, this is incorrect: it is the user of the chat software available to the applicant - this is known to the court - free to choose any number of nicknames and each freely under attend a pseudonym in the chat. The dial-in with a different nickname is thus also is not a behavior that would not be covered by the general use of power. Had the plaintiff wish to avoid this, it would have been free to organize access to their chat to, such that they Passwords or the nicknames configured not arbitrary, but it would have made for access condition that the user at least give her full respect to his real name and other data to identify and then all the known users access to only allow a pseudonym. This would have her open the possibility of an "undesirable" users will actually - at least in the technical sense - effectively excluded from using the chat software. That they did not choose this path, can not cause the behavior of those who as part of the move from the available options granted to Siemens, in retrospect, be regarded as unlawful.

Finally, contrary to what the applicant provided no evidence that the Defendant against protective legislation within the meaning of § 823 para 2 BGB has failed. Complained of by their "access surreptitiously" where neither the Teleservices Act, which regulates only the responsibility of those who make the content available in Internet, you can still § 265 a StGB - obtaining of benefits - Relevant. The acquisition is part of the chat with a different pseudonym shows no illegal alteration of data, such as defined in Penal Code § § 268 f. dar. Further suitable protection laws are also not evident.

Lag including as a result of the expressed by the applicant available to "virtual house ban" not an objective reason could, according to the Defendant on the other hand, the prohibition of contradictory behavior § ; called 242 BGB. He thus a counter-law was over from the the property rights flowing the available applicant under § 903 BGB. His continued use of the chat software was not illegal, it was that based on Civil Code § 1004 claim must be rejected to grant the injunction.

the costs follows from § 91 para 1 CCP, the decision on provisional enforceability is based on § § 708 No. 11, 711 ZPO.

Claims: 12.500, - €


http://www.jurawelt.com/gerichtsurteile/5156

How To Clean A Resin White G Shock

Hacker vs. Cracker: Perfect timing


Some Insiders are members of Wikipedia in the Wikimedia Germany eV, but that does not yet know the Crackers. The General Assembly will take place on Saturday 25 February 2006 by 13 clock in the house of the youth in Frankfurt am Main. The Hackers are pleased with a quiet smile on the elections board and the CEO Club decision.

found on Saturday in the Wikimedia Board elections. On that day shall also be decided whether the Wikimedia Germany eV is occupied with a future CEO. For this, the statutes are changed. If the majority of the members of this change , May decide the job will be published. But at the Wikimedia Germany eV is as so often

exactly reversed: it anticipates the decision of 25.02.2006 members and publishes the job as early as the 02/13/2006 on the Internet and at the same time in the weekend edition of the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (

FAZ) of 18./19.02.2006. A patent attorney Wikimedia compared this thing with an "attack from behind" and showed the FvMM group for comparing a protocol from another club with which to proceed properly, step by step had . A further reason for
deprivation of legal capacity
the Wikimedia Germany eV? If the members of my opposition to commercialization, a real profit to stay association, then these two anticipated actions caused substantial costs for the job. With the current "illegal" jobs of course will also include applications and these applications must of course be one way or even sent back to candidates. Here again fall unnecessary costs on. Perhaps applying one of Memmi friends as managing director of Wikimedia Germany eV? Payment under the Federal Employees' Collective (BAT IIa ) included. Then the inside work would be here on this blog paid for it. And remember that once again something of the Wikimedia. But perhaps precisely because of the application of the mole already friends outside. Maybe not, after being caught now also board member, Christian Thiele of the Wikimedia Germany eV for a Wikipedia hack. Cracker JD leaves too many traces. How about once, the hard drive

scratch to brush, JD? Maybe the rabbit is running quite different. For example, that the application to the District Court of Berlin because of the deprivation of legal capacity until Monday, which will be submitted 2/27/2006? Then, the Wikimedia on Saturday, 02/25/2006
actually free hit
. For the need of women gossip club already meet again to obtain shared with the members of a new club decision. You would in this case from there again from all over Europe come to a place. And again hostel beds in the "House of Youth" book. Perhaps, the old guy for this weekend already booked on 25/02/2006 beds and may not for me to stay there. For example, if it would be illegal without youth hostel card to stay still in the House of youth. Perhaps this kind of squatting trespassing or even the peace ? Overnight accommodation in a hostel with no identification? Overnight accommodation in a hostel on the pretext of a club membership card of the Wikimedia? The Wikimedia Germany eV claims for an overnight stay in the hostel one needs no hostel card, because you have only just a member of Wikimedia Germany eV to be. If the hostel for these purposes
zwangsumbenannt
? sniff Perhaps the friends of the mole this time the competent supervisory authority, whether it is permissible, at the expense of the youth authority to Vereinsauweisen parasitic ? What would really happen to all the youth hostels in Germany, when all clubs would handle that? Or is it about the public money available to cover the tax payer? And the real young people who have to resort to an expensive hotel or sleep under the bridge because it has the stingy Wikimedia Germany eV booked the whole hostel in Frankfurt? Perhaps these kinds of frivolous nights're not frivolous, but because the Wikimedia Germany eV is a kindergarten association that consists entirely of young people left behind? Youth from a youth club in Berlin's Kreuzberg district in which the squatters want to stay in Frankfurt, cheap or even free? As the purpose of the association for free Penner and eat the bread of the hostel included?

is perhaps the request for withdrawal of legal capacity exactly on 25 February 2006 by 13 clock with the district court filed Berlin, where it just starts at the same time the General Assembly of Wikimedia in Frankfurt? And the friends say from which the mole not smile all the time? Perhaps, however, goes out the application before? Perhaps womöglicherweise the application is already gone out the latest? Germany and the Wikimedia silent once more out to the members?

Perhaps the 2/25/2006 blog entry for the written already, but set in software so that the blog entry exactly right on 2/25/2006 at exactly 13:00 clock shows up here? The Friends of the mole would then have an alibi. But this is the perfect timing of Wikipedia Insiders with exactly 13 clock 00 minutes and 00 seconds not so noticeable, is the blog entry out of it then just clock at 13:18? Perhaps there is a coup on Saturday at Wikimedia meet? And therefore there is no live broadcast of the event via Webcam for the purpose of free knowledge ? Perhaps it's hot, restore, if welding
Markus
also there and at home can Roswitha C. again her Scottish husband
Nymala
? Maybe dressing up Markus welding this carnival Saturday as bulkheads and with no panties as Roswitha's husband is doing it? The Hackers are pleased with a quiet smile on this 25th February 2006.

Police Auctions Wyndham

Wikimedia: deprivation of legal capacity I

A local court in Berlin registered association must comply by law, for example, the association's purpose. This is not the case, the official court records to be deleted. Why a copy of a document in this blog? Just because.

sufficient for enforcement on the assets of an unincorporated association a judgment against the association Judgement (§ 735 ZPO). A club that is not quite ready can be sued, in the case of the association the position of an unincorporated association (§ 50 para 2 CCP).

§ 43 BGB "deprivation of legal capacity"

(1) The association may be deprived of legal capacity, if it jeopardized by an illegal decision of the General Assembly or by unlawful conduct of the Executive Board the common good .

(2) An association whose purpose under the statute is not aimed at a commercial business operation, can the legal capacity to be withdrawn if such a purpose. (4) An association whose legal capacity is based on presentation, the legal capacity to be withdrawn if a person other than the purpose pursued in the statute.


§ 74 BGB "resolution"


(3) is withdrawn from the association on the basis of § 43 BGB legal capacity, shall be registered as indicated by the competent authority.

So much for Part 1 of FvMM new series while Wikipedia admin Wikimedia Germany eV "
society to free knowledge
" called
Daniel Baur
aka " DAB. "in-thing at RoswithaC Achim Raschka a link to the source for free non-censored knowledge. Part 2 follows. Promised.

Cruises Going To Africa

Wikipedia: in favor of the outhouse Wikirena

has about 24 hours ago caught Mole Memmi, together with the ex-Wikipolizisten the Wikipedia admin and censor-Tron named "JD". And JD has not even notice when he has his voice in pro-Henriette Fiebig given user name change process. Markus has also welded the same miterwischt yet. Au Backe.

The Friends of Memmi it could not at first believe that just "JD" on 20.02.2006 at 01:32 the clock

84.60.128.234 (dslb-084-060-128-234.pools.arcor- ip.net) Arcor Germany used. The record here agreed exactly with the version of 19 February 2006 at 15:54 clock match, as JD has given in, which takes place before any public incitement and harassment procedures in of Wikipedia's per voice.

That should bring in some of the Tron thing to light, love 84.60.128.234 aka the big Gladiator JD in Wikirena. Now the pants are down. Human Mole children uh, ladies and gentlemen! Welcome! Are you still here in this sensational investigative journalism, the Wikipedia paparazzi. It does not take long and already there is again a new blog entry. About "JD" of course. So easy here the wind blows in terms of Tron. And has until such time as Tron family disappears from the Wikipedia just as it decided the European Court
so in cases like Mrs. L.
and are very much the desire of Tron's family members to their privacy re protected. Game over, Gladiator JD. Killed in the Wikirena in the outhouse.

Gigabyte S-series Best Graphics Card

Wikiprawda: You will zwangsumbenannt!

Ah, menno, Wikimedia Germany with your Wikipedia. Why only she is on, the name "Iaal" as allergic and performs a forced name change here? With a publicly advertised process, incitement against a Iaal it is first of all, to block the user name. And, although Iaal has done nothing else to sell them as correct predictions, which could have been avoided.

On 13 January 2006 at 14:32 clock Iaal reported in to the Wikipedia. Only 50 hours and 19 minutes later, the user name from the Wikipedia from beginner Wikipedia-service provider Markus sweat like forever locked. Forever and without prior consultation and without prior consultation process as is typical of the Wikiprawda. Justification by Markus sweat. "Iaal? He is a lawyer! Help, "and sashayed already fully automatically, the fake" Wikipedia threaten with legal action "in the lock database inside the Commons. Oh no, while only the back to lead again. Wikimedia Germany, is a membership organization that promotes free knowledge with forced name changes and wants to hammer and all lawyers in this way to flee.

But Iaal had asked not only to publish his reply , but also a solemn oath made that he never attacked the Wikipedia. On the contrary: Because of the clear legal

in
Tron thing
feared Iaal a restraining order and tried to warn both the purposes of free knowledge Wikipedia and the Wikimedia Germany eV. Actually, he is likely because of the ex-Nazi law called "Law on Legal Advice," but he took the risk to the community in purchasing. Wikimedia ignored the warning of the intelligent Seer, and in the meantime, this warning by Alexander Klimke and Arnomane been deleted. About a week later, then the fact of the district court injunction issued against the Wikimedia Berlin. What a disgrace for all the so-so clever redenen lawyers and lawyers of Wikipedia. If they start talking all been so smart, they would have left at least one Schutzschrift so as not to get the professional indemnity insurance problems. Also they have at the expense of the donor fund overslept. True, women still
Treasurer
? But Wikipedia-service provider has blocked sweat the Admin Markus Iaal and now to these seers legend are zwangsumbenannt. Namely, how often the free knowledge but not to promote and meet once again not the purpose of the association of Wikimedia Germany eV. The one must first imagine: first predictor block forever, then he is a legend and then he will zwangsumbenannt him back to the Pirates, sailing under the flag ship of fools under the leadership Captain Morgain
Anneke Wolf
purely forward. What a crap of the Wikiprawda ! Overall, a clear case of prohibited sun Admin arbitrariness and abuse of the admin buttons in connection with a defamation and criminal data change by the accused Markus sweat. It takes place on the Wikipedia and some even come from the Wikimedia Germany eV

supported. Just a day later after the data change from then on 20.02.2006 19.02.2006 confessed Markus sweat, that it's actually not a user lock, but about a forced name change. Iaal supposed to set a different user name: That was the prediction of
Iaal no nonsense, actually showed the
injunction granted and the other preliminary injunction against Wikimedia is still not lifted. "Wikimedia is an international nonprofit organization that is dedicated to the task, the knowledge of humanity to all people in the world to make it accessible," said the biggest bluff of all Wikipedia times of the Wikimedia Germany eV , a society for free and no one may know

about the injunctions anything . Wikiprawda how it lives. The Image Problem is currently estimating and not later than the bankruptcy they are away from the window. Now, however, the legend Iaal be zwangsumbenannt yet. The project, Wikipedia is now also known by the relevant Markus sweat seriously damaged. For this purpose the Wikimedia Germany has an application made retroactive to User Lock (!) - To take a vote rather than the community as to whether the forced renaming
Iaal
is permitted. Why not the same throughout the criminal Bunch kick and well isses? No, the irresponsible people are to the admin buttons such as Dirk Ingo Franke aka South Park and Markus sweat - how different it should be in the Wikiprawda - get away scot-free, of course, once more . So it's not about blocking a user, but a pure propaganda for an illegal and bullying procedures. Interesting this: § § 823 , 1004 BGB analog. Memmi, the mole and an ex-Wikipolizist have incurred can be anything. All the people that illegal in this process vote for a "pro-forced name change," snapped one with their IP addresses to them later for
Contacts section
to come out . This should then also for the Tron thing and still get the actionable right to pursue some days. Let's take these wild animals the lawyers to be devoured. The bureaucrats Stefan Kühn and Admin Michael Diederich with their forced renaming rights enforcement also the same time.

Noc Wife From Housband

Wikipedia: Wikimedia covered up crime

Who on the Wikipedia Crime committed and so threatened the project of Wikipedia, has lost basically nothing on the Wikipedia. Thus the view of several blog readers in the comments. That sounds right and just as logical as such when it is dark during the day light and at night. But not so with the Wikimedia Germany eV. There is just the opposite. Or rather, through frivolous twilight. Now was a hit again by the Wikimedia. This time: aka Daniel Baur from the Technical University of Darmstadt "DAB.".

it were not for the Wikimedia Germany eV, there would be no members. If there were no members, there would not be the Wikimedia Member Daniel Baur

. But it should not be. The reasons should be clear: Daniel Baur as DAB. is "a member of Wikimedia Germany, and also as service providers

administrator at the German Wikipedia. And in the interest of the Wikimedia Baur Germany tried to disappear on 19/02/2006 at 23:18 clock reporting a crime - instead he removed his admin buttons with the reported crime on the Wikipedia and thanks for pointing to as well the reputation of the Technical University Darmstadt to meet. The offense is the situation on 19.02.2006 for more than 24 hours online and the message was this swept under the table. Perhaps short for the many new blog readers. There are people who run the vandalism on Wikipedia, by committing crimes on Wikipedia. For example sedition, in which the content of Wikipedia banned slogans, text or Nazi symbols be filled. This is evil and in the German Wikipedia is such a fantastic filling illegal content on the Dutch 145.97.39.155 computer That within the European Union (EU) is

. Hence so is the EU law. The already proved the journal " seizure of the German Wikipedia? "there with the photographic evidence. And that a "real" Delete on the intelligence unit "Wikipedia: Vandal blocking" in general does not take place, for example, shows the following case of Daniel Baur aka of the TU Darmstadt "DAB." On 19 February 2006 at 00:58 clock was at the German Wikipedia by RoswithaC the personal life and intelligence sector at the expense of Henriette Fiebig violated, is punishable under § 201 StGB . It was this threat committed in connection with the
§ 74a StGB
the seizure of the computer with the the offense is. On 19/02/2006 at 18:00 of the clock was this blog entry. Nothing happened for many hours until 23:30 clock. refused, despite knowledge of this offense is many admins of Wikipedia to eliminate the violation of the law RoswithaC . To an anonymous blog reader, the collar exploded, she / he hinsurfte even for Wikipedia and vandalism in the specially appointed section "Wikipedia: Vandal blocking" reported. By now, some of the 190 service provider as admin by law obliged to remedy the violation. Remove? Error. It is just the opposite. The member of Wikimedia Germany eV Admin
Daniel Baur
"DAB." Destroyed the display of the blog reader while allowing the violation of RoswithaC want. And because blog readers are Christian Rohweder for facts and evidence cries, he may like the colorful exclusive photos again this time here: (Source: February 19, 2006 23:18 CET clock
)
http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title = Wikipedia% 3AVandalensperrung & diff = 13870465 & oldid = 13870238

This technical measure makes it possible for the crime report on the main page of the " Wikipedia: Vandals blocking
appears no longer only. Only with this Internet address - if, for example, as the
Insiders
of Wikipedia's knows - can be "deleted" content on the Wikipedia but ultimately recalled. Or if you know how the back door of the "History " yet again come to the "deleted" contents. For prosecution, this insider information can be very revealing: A real deleting content that is found normally take place not at 145.97 and they are still on the Dutch . 39 155 computer within and outside the EU common. And so it goes all the time. They are merely trying to cover up. Be it evil Sedition, be it pornographic material, it is all the slander and insults, the numerous data protection and privacy rights violations and whatever. The German Criminal Code through the entire bank. This 190 service provider which - such as Dirk Ingo Franke ,
Anneke Wolf
, Daniel Baur , Jan Henning , Markus welding - mainly drive have a German resident of this Vertuschspielchen also vorsä tzlich with and say, German law do not count for them . decisions of Judge of the Federal Court are only "cause-related incurred Troll article (see Talk: Tron (hacker)) without any scientific terms or just-right " says the Wikipedia Admin service provider Lung in its opinion. It would be interesting to know how many illegal content will be circulated clandestinely here in this way still world. Also, how many injured, lawyers, prosecutors and judges already on this bluff
of women gossip club called
Wikimedia Germany eV have fallen. The Dutch 145.97.39.155 computer , the wellspring for illegal spreads all over the world. A computer on the Wikimedia 190 with Wikipedia administrators as a responsible service provider access rights, management rights, enforcement rights, fire or other rights has . A computer that sits on a powder keg and when it comes to a lot of money. A time bomb, because it is also only a matter of time before the main prosecutor is formed after the Judicature Act and the German Wikipedia from all crimes, criminals and the state aid payable Service provider cleans. know the friends of the mole, why most of the 190 service provider their statutory and legal warnings and just refuse. The parties engaged in nearly 190 have something to hide and think they can behind the anonymity of Wikipedia hide . As well, there is the mole Memmi, who helps to clean up this scandalous mess. The same applies to the criminal file RoswithaC , the violation is still at Wikipedia online. And Jimmy Wales in

-Tron thing a letter of formal notice in the trash Iaals thrown, ignored the injunction from the district court of Berlin and Tron family name with the state from 20.02.2006 also still online. Jimbo & 190 German elephants, which brings a lot of trouble in a china shop. Because only 7 letters .

Bottom Four Teeth Are See Through

RoswithaC: catfight with seizures

A prison sentence of up to three years or a fine will be imposed on anyone who illegally is not publicly spoken words of another to a third party makes available on Wikipedia. The devices that used the persons who for the crime can be confiscated be. The talk is of Roswitha C. and their computer they used as one of the biggest trolls on the Wikipedia for such offenses.

really should at this point a blog entry about the love affair between RoswithaC

and Wikipedia admin Mark sweat what the eight nine-Ling Sisters of the Mole already
vorberichteten
. A classic theme for a gossip or tabloid newspaper about the shameless cheating of unsuspecting husbands find it RoswithaC married just a miserly Scotsman named Nymala is. And in turn presented to the Commons without underpants. lacked But in the big puzzle about all the crimes on the Wikipedia to the criminal data suppressions the Wikipedia admins Markus welding
nor the Criminal Code, part of the puzzle to
RoswithaC . For match and a feather flock together, they say so under gangster. Although could RoswithaC the defamation be shown that the lawyers they Iaal a criminal copyright infringement imputed for blackout purposes and then the evidence together with the cross-defendants Markus welding destroyed secretly. For the seizure of computers from RoswithaC and Markus sweat was not enough to do so, a V-man. to the effort of the Friends of the mole, as much evidence around the Tron case archive - for example, including death threats because of the and
Announcements
of property damage at the expense Trons parents - is not coincidental findings on the Wikipedia have been in vain for other . Now was RoswithaC caught in the act and the trol celled cat is Bag: violation of the confidentiality of the word, served a criminal offense under Penal Code § 201 , including § 74a StGB on the silver serving tray of prosecutor : (Source: RoswithaC, February 19, 2006 00:00 58
(CET);
http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title = User_talk: Henriette_Fiebig & diff = prev & oldid = 13839652

RoswithaC course was addressed to , but she refuses to eliminate this crime as it is so typical for the German Wikipedia. The violation is related to the update 02.19.2006 at 18:00 clock still
online. Asked about the motive and justification, said RoswithaC, they know the Iaal lawyer Christian Alber of Stuttgart since 1995 and in those 11 years they would definitely make in a position to form an opinion.

What a wicked Iaal ("I am a lawyer) must probably be disseminated as many bad false statements of fact, the world RoswithaC about Wikipedia. A few weeks ago and felt RoswithaC Markus sweat, or pursued by Rechtsanwalt Iaal Müller from Cologne . "You see, so be on what I'm doing here professionally," the next

of RoswithaC Flirt with Martin Steinmetz Iaal pass to the next Iaal on Wikipedia spy . "Yummy, thanks," and neither her husband Scottish still Markus welding something noticed by their numerous side affairs on the Wikipedia. It is not surprising if they get all the German bar associations and Wikimedia Germany eV as many legal problems and disadvantages by using other Iaals RoswithaC and Markus welding anti-competitive be. Of persecution as a motive for the numerous crimes on the Wikipedia, the prosecutor will not allow any event to impress when the Wikimedia Germany eV first to publish the IP numbers forces. Or will the prosecutor can perhaps Alexander Klimke aka " Berlin-Jurist ," Ex-Prosecutor Berlin, former State Office for State Protection and Ex-employees influence of the Federal Ministry of Interior? An agent with significant capabilities and a corresponding influence. DC
around the corner
: A twilight Wikimedia Germany eV and a mafia German Wikipedia middle of the catfight. It is clearly to too much money , fame and power . The Friends of the mole stay on the ball

Diaper Punished For A Year

Wikimedia: You're women gossip club!

It is 18 February 2006 and after 18:00 clock. The deadline for the arbitration proceedings has expired. It was in the Tron Wikischlacht around a hatchet to bury. The conditions for the deal in the sense, as an attempt at conciliation were in the interests of all parties fairly. The arbitration court has ruled. The decision will be published here.

first Recovery Iaal

"Iaal is (according to him) you can probably only be alone if you tell him to restore the account, which has deprived him your Gspusi Markus welding totally wrong and without any prior election vote (Admin arbitrariness, abuse of the admin buttons) because he has attacked the Wikipedia detectable before. Affidavit has already been "

Proof: Christian Rohweder

Anneke Wolf

Jan Henning" descriptor "
- as witnesses -
statement. Iaal with the state from 18.02.2006 to 18:01 Clock remains locked wrongly
. Wikimedia Board and Wikipedia admin Henriette Fiebig has Admin rights on their intentionally not used and thus accepted final taking place on its Wikipedia Admin arbitrariness, abuse of the admin buttons, among others.

Proof:
Christian Rohweder

Anneke Wolf

Jan Henning "descriptor"
- as witnesses -
second Petition for deselection Markus sweat (Admin arbitrariness, abuse of the admin buttons for Iaal case)

An application or dismissal Petition for re-election
Markus welding
because Admin arbitrariness, abuse of the admin buttons for Iaal case was - as of of 18/02/2006 at 18:01 clock -
Admin Henriette Fiebig detectable
not filed. Wikimedia Board and Wikipedia admin Henriette Fiebig has Admin rights on their intentionally not used and thus accepted final taking place on its Wikipedia Admin arbitrariness, abuse of admin rights, including those of Mark welding. Proof: Christian Rohweder

Anneke Wolf

Jan Henning "Descriptor"
- as witnesses -
third Recovery Wikilanu

"Wikilanu is (they claim) you can probably only be alone if you do you restore the account that you your Gspusi Dirk Ingo Franke aka South Park totally wrong and without prior election ballot was withdrawn (Admin arbitrariness, abuse of the admin buttons, etc.), as it has proven to be on the Wikipedia has never made an "excessive self-representation at the expense of others." Affidavit is already available. "

statement: Wikilanu is still blocked wrongly . A "

Excessive self-representation at the expense of other

" has not been detected . Wikimedia board member and Wikipedia admin Henriette Fiebig has admin rights from its intentionally not used and accepted it finally taking place on its Wikipedia Admin arbitrariness, abuse of admin rights, among others. Proof: Christian Rohweder

Anneke Wolf

Jan Henning "descriptor"
- as witnesses -
4th Deselection motion against South Park (Admin arbitrariness, abuse of the admin buttons to Wikilanu case)

A dismissal motion or re-election complaint against
Dirk Ingo Franke aka South Park
because Admin arbitrariness, abuse of the admin buttons for Wikilanu case was - as of of 18/02/2006 at 18:01 clock -
Admin Henriette Fiebig detectable
not filed. Wikimedia Board and Wikipedia admin Henriette Fiebig has not made use of their admin rights and thus accepted final taking place on its Wikipedia Admin arbitrariness, abuse of admin rights, including the Dirk Ingo Franke aka South Park . Proof: Christian Rohweder

Anneke Wolf

Jan Henning "descriptor"
- as witnesses -
decision

The Schlichungsverfahrensbeklagte, by Henriette Fiebig as
Supertopcheckerbunny
"relies on German civil, criminal and constitutional law. She put this many competing applications which are not part of the process. The arbitration applicant, represented by the FvMM Group requested that the additional distance and the reduction of the family name of Tron. Again, this application must be dismissed, since this is not the subject of this arbitration proceeding. They may be submitted in a separate arbitration proceedings. due to take place in case user blocking vandalism and admin vandalism in connection with Admin arbitrariness, abuse of the admin functions - by the Wikipedia admin
Markus welding
by the Wikipedia admin Dirk Ingo Franke aka South Park by Wikipedia Admin Henriette Fiebig as
Supertopcheckerbunny
(Forfeiture and use by toleration act as an impermissible exercise of rights) and the Wikimedia Germany eV in the 'Hacker vs . Cracker: Wikipedia unreasonable "from 13.02.2006 - was not eliminated by the Crackers . It was to be decided at the request of the FvMM group points to 5 Basic Law in conjunction with Article 20 IV Basic Law. On sheet http://fvmm.blogspot.com/2006/02/metzgerin-fiebig-notschlachtet-hase.html et seq of the Act by reference. The mediation attempt failed. It is thus that individual decision of FvMM group allowed under Article 5 of the Basic Law in conjunction with Article 20 IV Basic Law, the Schlichungsverfahrensbeklagte Wikimedia Germany eV related to " You are Germany! You are Mitstörer! "officially as a" You are women gossip club! to call. " This decision is immediately enforceable. The video session is closed.

Panama City (Panama), 18 February 2006 Prof. Tscharlie opposition cinema

-
arbitration judge
-

8 Months Pregnant Sore Spot

butcher notschlachtet Fiebig hare Pedia

Wikipedia, which was her female hare called Pedia . She fed and scratched Pedia daily. Then it was on the board of Wikimedia Germany. Treasure they were called there once. Therefore, Henriette Fiebig was treasurer. But their anti-woman Machoisten

cleared treasurer to the article, to torment them. So keep the butcher. Now she has flung and slaughtered the rabbit Pedia itself.

It was as always in the Tron-stable. The administrator's men there, the bunny fucked Pedia front and rear . "Who has more Reverts in Tron?" Said one of the male administrators. "I! And my longer, "was the motto of the largest tail compared Revertzeiten on Wikipedia. Then came Frank, ex-policeman Wikipolizei who unpacked his blog

. "Hen you can not on the Board the SPCA and are at home you're butcher, " brought it to the point of inside . But Fiebig was requested by the ex-Wikipolizisten not follow here in favor of Tron and Tron to bring parents the evidence to the District Court of Berlin. The injunction would indeed become final and remained there the family would also need to be removed from the German Wikiprangeria. But secretly betrayed them as a double agent, Wikipedia, namely the Wikipolizisten and Admin Klimke Alexander aka " Berlin-Jurist , "Ex-Prosecutor Berlin, former State Office for State Protection and ex-employees of the Federal Interior Ministry. An agent with significant capabilities and a corresponding influence. Double agent, the agent has Fiebig Klimke even sent to the Berlin court and so coincidentally, the preliminary injunction against Wikimedia Germany eV provisionally lifted. Even if the ECJ in the Woman L.

has decided the other way around, and even the seizure is due . No wonder then that the ex-Wikipolizist Frank at Henriette Fiebig had to let off his frustration. "You need I do not send emails begging, my reply is not, "said Frank in the outing against posting Fiebig and" The required documents have you not brought to the court and need them for this betrayal of Tron never again Munich come. busted is the double agent Henriette Fiebig, for "But you're quite the cunning peasant Alexander Klimke esch hung up to the guy who has thrown the papers later in Tron's organic waste." Said Frank. The whole mystery about Tron and widespread destruction of evidence is always exciting. More and more dramatic. More delicate.

To distract himself, is Fiebig on invitation gone out in the cinema. In the cinema contradiction. The film has really touched. The Bavarian State Data Protection Commissioner
there
played the lead role. When she came out from the cinema again, she did it for the first time how the hare Pedia was tormented by their own butcher club and how to trim the admins concealment of facts, the rabbit ears without anesthetic. The consequences of "Supertopcheckerbunny" as they call themselves so at Wikipedia and attributed this rabbit photo concluded: "The Supertopcheckerbunny has until further notice any more. Now is the end. Leave me alone. All. Go away! By the way: I mean it. Go away. Go your gone. And let me alone. " be (Henriette Fiebig on

02.13.2005, 05:31

)
It may be that the FvMM Insider Group at a recent meeting roast rabbit has eaten

. The idea by Don Wikidonso and Joe, after they were kotzübel at hundreds of PR ducks. What was, what, what remains? "Maybe I'll be back," said Henriette Fiebig, but to decide when they want themselves. It could are right. For since the extended executive board Mathias Schindler crime
party betrayal
against RA Short imputed , the Board Arne Klempert only one day previously sent home from the Wikipedia , busted the Board Fiebig as a double agent is and Pedia- Rights has slaughtered will seek the Wikimedia Germany eV in a job now a managing director. Meant to be expected: they even look himself in a job and involved in a payment under the federal civil service pay scale (BAT IIa) itself. It is exciting, because there are still a fact involved Zenedot-Verlag.

Northface Apex, How To Clean

URGENT: Raiders of the Lost Ark Tron crashes Wikimedia Board

Not warning, do not show, do anything, this was the recommendation of the web's most feared fighter. The talk is of RL, one of the Internet pioneers such as AMM. Now the second Chair of Wikimedia Germany Arne Klempert the power output via its red admiral buttons. Fast voluntary. In a high arc, he is kicked out. The calm before the storm sizes on Wikipedia now seems to be over. Who is the next victim of torture in Chinese Wikipedia?

Detailed information on "That was Arne Klempert

" and "This is RL, the Raiders of the Lost Ark Tron" and two specials
Wikischlacht around
Tron "and" The is the author of Revelation 23 "follow in kitchen shortly in a special edition. Popcorn and beer for free. And all this only because the stubborn concrete heads of the German Wikipedia Wikiprawda absolutely smothering the human dignity of Tron and Tron's family do not respect and still do. Ladies and gentlemen, Be there live, as it cracks and rattles. Now. Here. Completely exclusive. Only with http://fvmm.blogspot.com

How To Install Running Boards On Mdx

Interview: Baron Gravenreuth with FvMM / IG (FAQ Wikipedia)

An interview about the mafia entanglements between the Wikimedia Germany, the German Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation and the U.S. within the other participants. Lawyer Günter Freiherr von Gravenreuth from London asks questions. A reply from the IG and his friends Mole. A total of 21 people were involved.

Update:

The interviewer lawyer Baron Gravenreuth at Wikipedia, an encyclopedia for free non-knowledge: The Wikimedia Germany put out the first answers to this interview and shared it with own answers. That is why we have given our answers here. No need to worry

, dear R archive, even if Admin and Wikipolizist Tim " avatar " Bartel wants you to panic. However, whether Mr. Baron Gravenreuth eaten a roast rabbit with Indians, as we have done was outside the scope of the interview. PR ducks flying up we already had. But now to the point: were submitted by Gravenreuth questions: 1) What kind of a position of the German Association WIKIPEDIA?


2) it is only a fan club for the Inc. in the U.S.?

• 3) A fan club as a football club which is also not liable if the association mess of everything, or is this club?


• 4) Did / does this impact on WIKIPEDIA club itself?


• 5) Who is allowed, why make this club in what WIKIPEDIA?


• 6) Only one example of this is the question of who is who and why that barrier right in at WIKIPEDIA. (Contributions to the NPD and the publishing Heinz Heise are known to be revoked.)


• 7) Assigns American Inc. of blocking rights or mixed as the German Wikipedia with club?


• 8) As soon as he is a part, he is not only a fan club, but may be liable - at least as Mitstörer?


• 9) Gravenreuth: With the access, management and enforcement of rights would be the Admins may vicarious agent of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.. What specific services offer admins from Germany?


added to this FAQ, where Wikipedia is relatively long responses from the many that had seen all the same content. We have thus before a summary response, which is back after re-testing with the team and the IG FvMM reproduced here in the final version.

1) Gravenreuth: What a position, the German WIKIPEDIA club?

---

FvMM / IG:
First of all, to clarify that there is no "Wikipedia club" there. The association you think it is, according to the official court records Amtsgericht Berlin-Charlottenburg to " Wikimedia Germany - Society for the Advancement of Free Knowledge eV" (No. 23 855 Nz.). In the colloquial sense of the association will also briefly called "
Wikimedia Germany eV
. We want to make the moment no information about which license agreements or other contracts to use the protected name "Wikimedia" exist. The Wikimedia Germany eV is represented by § 26 BGB by the entire Board , that means: Kurt Jansson, Arne Klempert, Elisabeth Bauer, Henriette Fiebig, Patrick Danowski, Dirk Franke, Nina Gerlach, Martin Haase, Christian Thiele, Jakob Voss. There is also the Wikimedia Germany eV and a so-called "extended board

" named Mathias Schindler. The related official court records did not match, are sometimes contradictory and the data the imprint are incomplete. And despite several weeks of evidence, including the Lawblog where the board runs a regular service, are to date the information on the http://www.wikimedia.de/impressum/ not been completed.

comes after official figures from the association "Wikimedia Germany eV" outward "neutral and independent" in which supposedly committed to "free knowledge". The inquiry has found, however, that the "Wikimedia Germany eV" in fact very well deep in the Wikipedia database to the Wikimedia system in Holland (EU member) is involved and the "free knowledge" is not very pleasant. For example, numerous members of the "Wikimedia Germany eV" also system operators of the German Wikipedia. This has the result that their own interests "Wikimedia Germany eV" in the form of targeted at the German Wikipedia are introduced. There are numerous lawsuits against the "Wikimedia Germany eV", which are concealed on the German Wikipedia. According to our information there are 52 disputes. Cases part in a "secret" mailing list discussed to which a mole has access to his friends and sometimes

this report. The engineering of the German Wikipedia is the latest in the Tron thing has become very noticeable. Attempts to improve such as third parties, the supposedly neutral entry for "
Wikimedia
" article by they want to bring all the completed and unfinished business disputes for the purpose of a free information in the article, the "Wikimedia Germany eV" immediately with the board members there and tries to cover up information about . For the cover-up the admin rights to such manipulation purposes be abused. The "Wikimedia Germany eV" thus ensures that it is represented in the Wikimedia record as one-sided. Of a "promotion of free knowledge

" - as the association states in his official judicial records - thus may no longer be any question. The association's purpose is not fulfilled even for these reasons. It was also found on the domain management and operating company eG in Frankfurt ( Denic ) that a Mr Arne Klempert both Domain holder and administrative contact for this domain name is WIKIPEDIA.DE. The specified with Denic mailing address of the Arne Klempert with " Wiener Strasse 7, 10999 Berlin " is incorrect. The mailing address of the summons Arne Klempert is "
Friedrich-Ebert-Straße 1 61462 Königstein im Taunus
. Since there are several legal disputes, is suspected as a motive, that the misrepresentation with Denic will lead to deport as many legal disputes by Arne Klempert to the "Wikimedia Germany eV" - while simultaneously Klempert would remain in possession of the domain name. Arne Klempert is as relevant in the scene domain trader. We Arne Klempert, a board member of Wikimedia Germany eV, a trap and are able to track that exists between Arne Klempert and " BooCompany " a connection. Klempert distributed content both in the Commons, and in the Wikimedia Germany eV, while still in the BooCompany. The "BooCompany" in turn consists of many contributing journalists who are known for large daily newspapers and online magazines full-time employees. It could also be noted that there are "oral" orders from publishers that these particular editors are simultaneously involved in the Wikipedia and Wikinews, so for more readers and thus for more " ; Hits to make. " The ranking produced by indirectly increases with the setting up hyperlinks to publishers play a role in this approach. There are the "ok" by Arne Klempert. Overall, this leads to additional financial revenues of the publishers and editors involved in the BooCompany.

The BooCompany are as Domain owner a Mr. Robert D. Macao, WTC 9th Floor Apt. 12 / 4 in Panama Panama 225-11111 PA "on. An auxiliary man from Panama was recheriert site in Panama to the domain owner. The report shows that there is no "Robert D. Macao, WTC 9th Floor Apt. 12 / 4 in Panama Panama 225-11111 PA "to the domain name is the BooCompany. The information on the domain name are incorrect will equally . The structured approach to network and BooCompany is with the Wikimedia Germany eV and almost identical in many respects extremely striking the same, so that accidents are excluded. It is also the mailing address of the German Boocompany and Super Company with a "Betty Hoss, Torstrasse 23 in 10119 Berlin" doubtful. This designed by man network entanglements lead to the result that many press reports are distorted and misrepresented in many ways. This means that manipulated Wikipedia decisive influence with the press, the public power. In the Tron thing that is busted. The European Court of Justice would decide in view of current EU laws: Lies have short legs, even when the press writes it otherwise manipulated.





2) Gravenreuth: Is he only a fan club for the Inc. in the U.S.?

---

FvMM / IG:
Absolutely not.



3) Gravenreuth: A fan club as a football club which is also not liable if the association mess of everything, or is this club?

---

FvMM / IG:
The current status of the investigation is that it deals with the "Wikimedia Germany eV" mainly is just a camouflage. Behind this are quite clear financial and commercial interests. What impressed us was that the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. in St. Petersburg, Florida (USA) of which He has become aware of these machinations Jimmy Wales condoned. From another research shows the same time that the Wikimedia Foundation, missing several hundreds of thousands of U.S. dollars. Golem, for example, reported on . It can not be excluded that additional motives for the manipulation of the German Wikipedia can be found. To answer your question

with the example of football club: There are on the Wikipedia 190 actors who pretend to be 190 Franz Beckenbauer and claim they are all in Kitzbühel. In their own rights violations should be then please contact the real Franz Beckenbauer in Kitzbühel . Contact Does the real Franz Beckenbauer, then a warning, ask the other 190 actor: "Yes, today is Christmas scho"



4) Gravenreuth: Did / does this impact on society itself WIKIPEDIA ?

---

FvMM / IG:
Yes, that is verifiable and part of which was published in the Insider blog.



5) Gravenreuth: Who is allowed, why make this club in what WIKIPEDIA?

---

FvMM / IG:
from investigation tactical reasons, we can do this yet no full with information. If you nachrecherieren the names of board members and the club members, come sooner or later that parts of them also are members of the Chaos Computer Club eV in Berlin at the same time. Examples: Henriette Fiebig is a board member of Wikimedia Germany eV and a member of the CCC eV same time, it is also a service provider of the German Wikipedia.

Mathias Schindler is a member of the extended board of Wikimedia Germany eV and a member of the CCC eV, while service providers under the German Wikipedia. And here's the best example:

Arne Klempert is a board member of Wikimedia Germany eV and as a private individual owner of the domain name WIKIPEDIA.DE. He is also a member of the BooCompany and at the same time service providers under the German Wikipedia.

This way, you go once
all 190 service provider
by the German Wikipedia, as have the Friends of the mole already done. And please keep in your subconscious and the Law against Unfair Competition (UWG).





6) Gravenreuth: Only one example of this is the question of who is who and why that barrier right in at WIKIPEDIA. (Contributions to the NPD Heinz Heise publishing house and are known to be blocked)

---

FvMM / IG.
According to the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., in Florida (USA) have the situation as at 11.02.2006 a total of 190 people found this special access, management and enforcement of rights to content from the German Wikipedia. There are the Outing list related to the
http://wikipolizei.blogspot.com/
. These 190 people are independent system operators, and have these special rights of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. obtained. The majority of jurists is in the opinion that in these 190 systems operators - just because they own, go it alone and self-critically on their access, management and enforcement of rights of use - each individual is in itself a separate service provider. However, most of the legal requirements refuse to § 6 TDG and § 10 MdStV to follow and does not satisfy the information requirements to their individual users' pages. This identity disguising a legal vacuum for illegal actions on the Wikipedia is simulated. The illegal use in the case of Tron was just the tip of the iceberg, for example, about the European data protection law. The fact that the article on the Heise publishing house is locked, should womöglicherweise a rather simple reason that: a journalist who is employed by the Heise publishing house, is also an administrator at the German Wikipedia. Target the most positive representation of this company and their own corresponding entries and the "competitors" is to be monitored. Furthermore, they receive support from the scene of the "Stop1984" monitoring group. In one of the Heise-Forum News the issue was already addressed. Part of this criticism has been deleted from the Heise-Forum. Other parts are in turn still online. In principle, regardless of the Heisenberg case, the trend is clearly definable Sun: "distortion of competition by Wikipedia", just as the new CD / DVD via Zenedot-Verlag is to come on the market (
"WP 1.0: Wikipedia in 100 volumes, which will Zenodot German Wikipedia
printing on 80,000 pages
"
the same time according to a study exist as
1 million misspelling
). These arguments of the commercial background intentions are currently not dismissed out of hand. In a small book or novelette about Wikipedia with 50 pages could have been even turn a blind eye. Here but it goes to 80,000 pages in 100 volumes per reader. Millions of dollars, if that should be enough at all. Adding also the added Zusatzeinnamen other companies and publishers, are likely to go the total sales in the range of billions of dollars.

7) Gravenreuth: Assigns American Inc. of blocking rights or mixed as the German Wikipedia with club?

---

FvMM / IG:
Both. The American Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. presents this access, administration and enforcement of these rights 190 German service provider for the German Wikipedia. Not all of these 190 people, many of which are simultaneously board members and regular members organize the "Wikimedia Germany eV" The choice of administrators, the relevant people themselves make this known each other for their own candidate, vote (of course) of choice for Admin status and you have a choice run. Subsequently, the election result of "a" (meaning: one's own) Admin to the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. reported. Via so-called German bureaucrats with German residence and stewards will be the technical database changes to the user name changed and you are the special access, management and enforcement rights active.

However, we have also noted that there has been "awarded" in at least 8 cases admin rights, without ever held a proper election Admin. They work on admin internal displacements of so-called "empty" Admin account. Busted is the whole, than in the middle of a shift in a general software error has occurred and the Commons so as to "strange" overlaps in the data base check came. In like we are still in a separate report and this blog entry with photos vividly demonstrate how the database cracker abuse of Wikipedia. Another abuse of admin rights are the so-called sock puppet accounts, that the possession and the assignment of several admin accounts to a single person. The official number, it would be with the 190 service provider as 190 different people, is no longer credible. There are both much less people, because some of them have multiple admin accounts. But on the other hand, is to also include the estimated number of illegal Admin accounts for complementary domestic integrated unauthorized persons. For the rules on the TDG and MdStV this should have no influence. Are you one way or the imprint of charge as a service provider. Sooner or later, the cards have on the table.





8) Gravenreuth: As soon as he is a part, he is not only a fan club, but may also be liable - at least as Mitstörer.

---

FvMM / IG:
would be after a very scientific investigation is not such a generalization dismissed as simple like that. Doubt, Mitstörung as such do not exist on the whole. For this purpose, the supreme court in Germany are very unique. Problems but it could be in pursuit of the right and the proper Mitstörer Beweispflichtigkeit that the prosecution will be imposed on a regular basis. In an "internal" mailing list on Wikipedia are this particular Klimke Alexander - who was appointed on Stammtisch visits to the admin - and Mathias Schindler - of the enlarged Bureau of the Wikimedia heard - How about in the following manner presented: "silent as the grave accusations and let the other side prove it, where as non-admin does not have access to the crucial evidence added. In the worst case, it is also sufficient to simply deny the user name. "

Any legal action will initially be as a non admin, in fact, before a legal problem. It lacks the IP numbers. It lacks the data to the email addresses. It therefore can not properly an infringement may be proved, and the log files are located in the United States. We want the reference to two examples from practice:


a)
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Günter_Freiherr_von_Gravenreuth



"He also writes to this day frequently Article in forums, especially in the Heise Forum. His account was used there on 22 Closed in December 2004. Since the law has not adhered to this barrier, the Heise Verlag had brought in the meantime an injunction before the Regional Court of Munich. Under this procedure, Baron Gravenreuth against the Heise publishing the notice of the contract recognized and given a cease and desist letter for the record. "

Assuming that the cease and desist issued a penalty has been signed, would be in such content, these penalty payable immediately. The false assertion of fact particularly the emphasis on "today" (2/11/2006) is the result context: "He also writes frequently to this day the article 02/11/2006 [..] in the Heise Forum." even though the injunction proceedings ld longest completed. One can not be at Heise-Forum locked and simultaneously write it again "to this day" article in Heise Forum. Either it is day or night. Several details need not be explained in large. At stake is the Mitstörerhaftung and the question to be addressed, who is liable for this.

Only with much effort and patience can the traces left of the responsible Mitstörer trace of the history. For example: Who has this entry " He also writes frequently to this day

" written? Who has improved the formulation and brought on the current (and correct) stand? Who reverse these changes and thus the illegal content as its own? For an outsider a lot of work. For an insider's play observed. For an admin, however, also play easily destructible.


b)
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tron_ (Hacker) and http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diskussion:Tron_ (Hacker)

FvMM / IG: This case goes to the post-mortem personality right in favor of Tron and the accompanying human dignity. As Tron has a unique family name in Germany, he is also with all the family members easily identifiable. Tron's intention with his pseudonym Tron is no accident, for he wanted to protect his family. This specific case does so also in the personality and self-determination rights of family members. For this purpose there it by the ECJ case law, which also was discussed here in this blog with the criminal acts Mrs L. .

Even here in the Tron thing can be nachrecheriert who is responsible for what purpose and when this happened. The advantage of the situation took a the 190 service provider as admin, Alexander Klimke, abused the access and delete rights, and secretly destroyed important evidence in the history. Since 2 February officially nothing is known of who can be held liable as Mitstörer all in recent weeks and months. Officially. The emphasis is officially unofficially as were the friends of the mole faster and important evidence have archived for Mitstörerhaftung. On the other hand, the abuse has made Alexander Klimke the content our own and this could be held liable.



9) Gravenreuth: With the access, management and enforcement of rights would be the Admins may vicarious agent of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.. What specific services offer admins from Germany?

---

FvMM / IG:
For example, the services for the management and maintenance of the introduced third-party content as defined as a self-service services (TDG). The Wikimedia Foundation has absolutely nothing to do. The provision of service does each of the 190 administrators independently for themselves. The Wikimedia Foundation has done so only slightly, because, as a domain owner for the service and access this content via Holland (EU member) and ensures there

likewise, the technology provides, see also Photos here. Hence for wikipedia.org the Wikimedia Foundation, § 9 of the TDG follows: § 9 TDG "transmission of information" (1) services provider for other information they submit in a communication network, or to which they provide access to not be responsible if it first the transmission does not induced, second
the receiver of the transmission and not selected third
the information have not been selected or modified.

This sentence 1 shall not apply if the service provider deliberately

working with one of the recipients of his service in order to commit unlawful acts. "


If you today from the Sweep up voluntarily in the pedestrian zone in Munich, by skipping embark on a disk or build other crap, this is not the city of Munich is responsible and must pay the claim only because the pedestrian zone extended through Munich running. You are the street sweepers. It is your service to provide services. For selbstverzapften crap just want to you to. But should the city of Munich have knowledge of what you are doing in their district, they can intervene and prohibit you tolerate this or that in spite of knowledge. A completely different set of circumstances would be if you have employment employed as street sweepers in the city of Munich. Between the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., and the 190 service provider in any case, there is no contractual relationship.

Tip: Watch this simply continue Insider blog. There is also material for the book "Revelation 23" by an anonymous author, who finished, the family of Tron viciously. We know the meantime, whoever it is ...

---