The Wikimedia Germany eV and the German Wikipedia refuse to appoint their representatives and the competent data protection supervisory authority. And even though she already has a very clear knowledge of data protection sought. They acknowledged receipt and that's never been. So not.
The publication of the reply has so far refused and "illegal" forced renaming process goes to first place does not address the data protection aspects. No matter Wikimedia Germany eV or whether the German language Wikipedia with all the service provider and their residence in Germany, German laws are apparently completely damn them and they can in fact be important:
Opinion Iaal
" Hi Henry & Co., I agree to a forced name change, since it would hinder my voluntary work items to free knowledge from the Wikipedia anti-competitive and at the same time the name is protected. Will be forced to rename or held a different kind of sanction, for the Wikimedia Foundation, Jimmy Wales does not contractually determined Agreement in favor of Wikimedia Germany eV and for the benefit of de.wikipedia.org has issued, then the relevant Data Protection Officer of Wikimedia Germany eV with the associated supervisory authority IAAL record for my German de.wikipedia.org to be solved between, § 20, paragraph 2 of the Federal Privacy Act.
I'm after the deletion of the record IAAL agree that another IAAL IAAL a new record for IAAL account can set up German de.wikipedia.org. IAAL is only a concept, stands for "I am a lawyer " ("I am a lawyer") and, according to the Federal Bar Association there alone is only in Germany for about 100,000 other lawyers. Having regard to the filing system to meet within their respective tasks is no longer necessary.
What this means exactly, I try to explain to the layman like this: Both the user blocking and the forced name change is not permitted for many legal reasons for privacy in particular, since only the collection of my own already IAAL record by de.wikipedia.org and because of the lack of the Wikimedia specifications for Teleservices Data Protection Act inadmissible from the outset and was therefore unlawful. Thus, only the deletion of the IAAL record is allowed. Should be the change, I refer here to the penalty and fines to the Federal Privacy Act, and teleservices data protection law "
source. http://fvmm.blogspot.com/2006/02/
wikiprawda-du- will-zwangsumbenannt.html # c114051926817956395
, responsible data protection officer is not mentioned. The reply of the Wikimedia Germany eV is not published at the same place on the Wikipedia and the causing Admin Mark Welding has - how typical it is for him - not want to. And, the records and the contents of Iaal not been deleted even though the board member Henriette Fiebig took both requests and receive and receive even more explicitly has confirmed.
were removed for the records of censoring Admin Stephan Tesch , the censored not only to third parties, but even himself One has to "Steschke" according to the blog entry " criticism is top secret "dated 30.01.2006 around 08:30 clock - In which the censoring Stephan Tesch is blown completely - then about 11 hours later at 19:32 on 30/01/2006 Teschke clock records disappear completely . This proves that the deletion is working very well and Iaal with its data protection statement (see above) was right. Deletion is possible. In the German Wikipedia is lied and cheated so crooked can not even turn the bars.
0 comments:
Post a Comment